The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phases of massive gravity
Open accessAbstract
We systematically study the most general Lorentz-violating graviton mass invariant under three-dimensional Eucledian group. We find that at general values of mass parameters the massive graviton has six propagating degrees of freedom, and some of them are ghosts or lead to rapid classical instabilities. However, there is a number of different regions in the mass parameter space where massive gravity is described by a consistent low-energy effective theory with cutoff ~ (mMPl)1/2. This theory is free of rapid instabilities and vDVZ discontinuity. Each of these regions is characterized by certain fine-tuning relations between mass parameters, generalizing the Fierz–Pauli condition. In some cases the required fine-tunings are consequences of the existence of the subgroups of the diffeomorphism group that are left unbroken by the graviton mass. We found two new cases, when the resulting theories have a property of UV insensitivity, i.e. remain well behaved after inclusion of arbitrary higher dimension operators without assuming any fine-tunings among the coefficients of these operators, besides those enforced by the symmetries. These theories can be thought of as generalizations of the ghost condensate model with a smaller residual symmetry group. We briefly discuss what kind of cosmology can one expect in massive gravity and argue that the allowed values of the graviton mass may be quite large, affecting growth of primordial perturbations, structure formation and, perhaps, enhancing the backreaction of inhomogeneities on the expansion rate of the Universe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space
Dvali, G., Gabadadze, G., & Porrati, M. (2000) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00669-9 · Cited by 3,513
Massive and mass-less Yang-Mills and gravitational fields
van Dam, H., & Veltman, M. (1970) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(70)90416-5 · Cited by 1,288
Strong interactions and stability in the DGP model
Luty, M. A., Porrati, M., & Rattazzi, R. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/09/029 · Cited by 672
Cited by
Galileon as a local modification of gravity
Nicolis, A., Rattazzi, R., & Trincherini, E. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.064036 · Cited by 1,863
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
de Rham, C. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-7 · Cited by 1,120
Imperfect dark energy from kinetic gravity braiding
Deffayet, C., Pujolàs, O., Sawicki, I., & Vikman, A. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/026 · Cited by 704
Starting the Universe: stable violation of the null energy condition and non-standard cosmologies
Creminelli, P., Luty, M. A., Nicolis, A., & Senatore, L. (2006) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/12/080 · Cited by 526
Metadata
- Authors
- L.Dubovsky, S.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2004-11-01
- Volume
- 2004
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 076-076
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168780325
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phases of massive gravity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/10/076
- The paper
- L.Dubovsky, S. (2004). Phases of massive gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/10/076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.