Cited by 407Random Matrices and ApplicationsBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models

Topological expansion for the 1-hermitian matrix model correlation functions.

Open access
Eynard, B·2004·Journal of High Energy Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/031

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once the two special quantities are determined, all other corrections to the resolvent correlators are determined by equation (4.38).

    “Once these two quantities are determined, all other corrections to the resolvent correlators are determined by:4.38”
  • The loop equations were studied a long time ago by Migdal, but they were put in their most useful form by Eynard.

    “The loop equations themselves were studied a long time ago (Migdal 1975), but they were put in its most useful form by Eynard (2004).”
  • A direct way to derive the equivalence between JT gravity and a double-scaled matrix integral is through the loop equations or topological recursion relations of the matrix model.

    “A very direct way to derive the equivalence between JT gravity and a double-scaled matrix integral is through the so-called loop equations or topological recursion relations of the matrix model, which provide a recursive relation that determines all or equivalently , in the 1/L or expansion.”
  • This form of the loop equations was derived in Eynard (2004), and is written for a spectrum with support on the positive real line; for more general spectral support the expression is the same but with the residue taken at both endpoints.

    “This form of the loop equations was derived in Eynard (2004), and is written for the case of a spectrum with support on the positive real line . For more general spectral support , the expression is the same, but with the residue taken at both endpoints.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eynard, B.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Eynard, B
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2004-11-12
Volume
2004
Issue
11
Pages
031-031
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1524762130
Cited by
407
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 25
FWCI
18.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Random Matrices and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Keywords
Hermitian matrix model, 1/N expansion, topological expansion, loop equations, correlation functions, hyperelliptic curves, residues, Feynman diagrams, random matrix theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review