Constraining the New Aether: gravitational Cherenkov radiation
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Demanding that high energy cosmic rays not emit the extra aether modes and assuming no significant Lorentz violation for cosmic rays yields bounds on the coefficients in Equation (48).
“Demanding that high energy cosmic rays not emit these extra modes and assuming no significant Lorentz violation for cosmic rays yields the bounds 102 on the coefficents in Equation (48).”
From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [105]
If no gravity-aether mode can be superluminal, then these bounds imply that every coefficient is generically bounded by |ci| < 10−15.
“If, as the authors of [105] argue, no gravity-aether mode can be superluminal, then these bounds imply that every coefficient is generically bounded by |ci| < 10−15.”
From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [105]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 204
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- See for instance, F. Cane et al., Bound on Lorentz-and CPT-violating boost effects for the neutron, physics/0309070; JHEP08(2005)066 · arXiv
- C.D. Lane, Clock comparison and muon tests of Lorentz symmetry, PhD. thesis, Indiana University, 2000 (UMI-99-93635);
- See for instance, D. Colladay and V.A. Kostelecky, CPT violation and the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 6760 [hep-ph/9703464]; · arXiv
- V.A. Kostelecky and R. Lehnert, Stability, causality and Lorentz and CPT violation, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 065008 [hep-th/0012060]; · arXiv
- Authors
- Elliott, J. W., Moore, G. D., & Stoica, H.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- ORCID
- Moore, Guy D
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2005-08-17
- Volume
- 2005
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 066-066
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975127465
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- spontaneous Lorentz violation, ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, vector-tensor gravity, energy loss, modified gravity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
