The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion
Open accessAbstract
We argue that certain apparently consistent low-energy effective field theories described by local, Lorentzinvariant Lagrangians, secretly exhibit macroscopic non-locality and cannot be embedded in any UV theory whose S-matrix satisfies canonical analyticity constraints. The obstruction involves the signs of a set of leading irrelevant operators, which must be strictly positive to ensure UV analyticity. An IR manifestation of this restriction is that the “wrong” signs lead to superluminal fluctuations around non-trivial backgrounds, making it impossible to define local, causal evolution, and implying a surprising IR breakdown of the effective theory. Such effective theories can not arise in quantum field theories or weakly coupled string theories, whose S-matrices satisfy the usual analyticity properties. This conclusion applies to the DGP brane-world model modifying gravity in the IR, giving a simple explanation for the difficulty of embedding this model into controlled stringy backgrounds, and to models of electroweak symmetry breaking that predict negative anomalous quartic couplings for the W and Z. Conversely, any experimental support for the DGP model, or measured negative signs for anomalous quartic gauge boson couplings at future accelerators, would constitute direct evidence for the existence of superluminality and macroscopic non-locality unlike anything previously seen in physics, and almost incidentally falsify both local quantum field theory and perturbative string theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space
Dvali, G., Gabadadze, G., & Porrati, M. (2000) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00669-9 · Cited by 3,513
Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant
Weinberg, S. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2607 · Cited by 1,166
Strong interactions and stability in the DGP model
Luty, M. A., Porrati, M., & Rattazzi, R. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/09/029 · Cited by 672
Cited by
Galileon as a local modification of gravity
Nicolis, A., Rattazzi, R., & Trincherini, E. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.064036 · Cited by 1,863
Self-citationBeyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
de Rham, C. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-7 · Cited by 1,120
The effective field theory of inflation
Cheung, C., Fitzpatrick, A. L., Kaplan, J., Senatore, L., & Creminelli, P. (2008) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/014 · Cited by 1,175
The Swampland: Introduction and Review
Palti, E. (2019) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 · Cited by 908
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, A., Arkani-Hamed, N., Dubovsky, S., Nicolis, A., & Rattazzi, R.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2006-10-04
- Volume
- 2006
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 014-014
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144658339
- Cited by
- 1,041
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/10/014
- The paper
- Adams, A., Arkani-Hamed, N., Dubovsky, S., Nicolis, A., & Rattazzi, R. (2006). Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/10/014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.