Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classical and quantum gravity of brane black holes

Gregory, Ruth, Ross, Simon F, Zegers, Robin·2008·Journal of High Energy Physics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/029

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are several examples of higher-dimensional static braneworld black holes, both analytically and numerically constructed.

    “In fact, there are several examples of higher-dimensional static braneworld black holes, both analytically and numerically constructed [67][68][69][70][71][72][201][202][203][204][205][206][207][208].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [202]

  • The boundary CFT stress-tensor can be computed in full using holographic renormalization methods, leading to ⟨T ij ⟩ = - 3ħN 2 32π 2 l 4 4 g ij .

    “To see this, consider the boundary CFT stress-tensor, which can be computed in full using holographic renormalization methods, leading to [202]”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [202]

  • The stability structure remains the same with branes included.

    “The stability structure remains the same with branes included [202].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [202]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975)
  2. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999), hep-th/9906064. · arXiv
  3. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998), hep-th/9711200. · arXiv
  4. S. S. Gubser, Phys. Rev. D 63, 084017 (2001), hep-th/9912001. · arXiv
  5. M. J. Duff and J. T. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2052 (2000), hep-th/0003237. · arXiv
  6. M. J. Duff, J. T. Liu and H. Sati, Phys. Rev. D 69, 085012 (2004), hep-th/0207003. · arXiv
  7. T. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 148 (2003) 307-316, gr-qc/0203082. · arXiv
  8. R. Emparan, A. Fabbri, and N. Kaloper, JHEP 08 (2002) 043, hep-th/0206155. · arXiv
  9. A. L. Fitzpatrick, L. Randall, and T. Wiseman, JHEP 11 (2006) 033, hep-th/0608208. · arXiv
  10. P. Binetruy, C. Deffayet and D. Langlois, Nucl. Phys. B 565, 269 (2000), hep-th/9905012. · arXiv
  11. N. Kaloper, Phys. Rev. D 60, 123506 (1999), hep-th/9905210. · arXiv
  12. P. Bowcock, C. Charmousis and R. Gregory, Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 4745 (2000), hep-th/0007177. · arXiv
  13. A. Chamblin, S. W. Hawking, and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 065007, hep-th/9909205. · arXiv
  14. R. Gregory, Class. Quant. Grav. 17, L125 (2000), hep-th/0004101. · arXiv
  15. A. Fabbri and G. P. Procopio, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 5371 (2007), 0704.3728 [hep-th].
  16. C. Charmousis and R. Gregory, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 527 (2004), gr-qc/0306069. · arXiv
  17. R. Emparan, J. Garcia-Bellido, and N. Kaloper, JHEP 01 (2003) 079, hep-th/0212132. · arXiv
  18. H. Kudoh, T. Tanaka, and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 024035, gr-qc/0301089. · arXiv
  19. H. Kudoh, Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 104019, hep-th/0401229. · arXiv
  20. A. Karch and L. Randall, JHEP 05 (2001) 008, hep-th/0011156. · arXiv
  21. A. Chamblin and A. Karch, Phys. Rev. D 72, 066011 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0412017 · arXiv
  22. T. Hirayama and G. Kang, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 064010, hep-th/0104213. · arXiv
  23. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, JHEP 04 (1999) 017, hep-th/9903224. · arXiv
  24. E. Witten and S.-T. Yau, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 1635-1655, hep-th/9910245. · arXiv
  25. V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (1999) 413-428, hep-th/9902121. · arXiv
  26. M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, JHEP 07 (1998) 023, hep-th/9806087. · arXiv
  27. S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin, and K. Skenderis, Commun. Math. Phys. 217 (2001) 595-622, hep-th/0002230. · arXiv
  28. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 505 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9803131]. · arXiv
  29. S. Hemming and L. Thorlacius, arXiv:0709.3738[hep-th]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gregory, R., Ross, S. F., & Zegers, R.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2008-09-05
Volume
2008
Issue
09
Pages
029-029
ISSN
1029-8479
Cited by
39
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review