Cited by 8Quantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsQuantum optics and atomic interactionsLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications

Quantum field representation of photon-molecule interactions

Open access
Bradshaw, David S, Forbes, Kayn A, Andrews, David L·2020·European Journal of Physics

Abstract

In reporting and explaining the interactions of light with atoms and molecules, a photon-based description is not only appropriate but clearly essential when electronic or other kinds of quantum transition ensue. However, textbook treatments frequently go no further than the Planck relation, in representing the quantum nature of the light itself—often resorting to classical principles when discussing mechanism. Complete consistency and rigour can be achieved by treating both the matter and the radiation in a fully quantised form, which requires the electromagnetic fields to be cast in a quantum field representation. It proves possible to develop a rigorous approach to this theory that is simple to convey and apply, and which lends itself to a significantly enhanced level of appreciation of mechanism. This paper lays a concise foundation and exemplifies the application in three specific cases: absorption, emission and scattering. It is also shown how this formulation affords a basis for applications in higher-order, multiphoton and nonlinear optical processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6404/ab7028

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Andrews D L and Allcock P 2002 Optical Harmonics in Molecular Systems (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH)
  2. Scully M O and Zubairy M S 1997 Quantum Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  3. Ficek Z and Wahiddin M R 2016 Quantum Optics for Beginners (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press)
  4. Stokes A 2016 Quantum optical dipole radiation fields Eur. J. Phys. 37 034001 · DOI
  5. Andrews D L and Bradshaw D S 2018 Introduction to Photon Science and Technology (Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press)

Authors
Bradshaw, D. S., Forbes, K. A., & Andrews, D. L.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Venue
European Journal of Physics
Published
2020-02-18
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
025406
ISSN
  • 0143-0807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6404
OpenAlex
W3003868889
Cited by
8
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Leverhulme Trust (ECF-2019-398)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Keywords
quantized electromagnetic field, light-matter interaction, absorption, emissions, scattering, multiphoton processes, nonlinear optics, Planck relation, quantum transitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review