The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We propose a partially learned approach for the solution of ill-posed inverse problems with not necessarily linear forward operators. The method builds on ideas from classical regularisation theory and recent advances in deep learning to perform learning while making use of prior information about the inverse problem encoded in the forward operator, noise model and a regularising functional. The method results in a gradient-like iterative scheme, where the ‘gradient’ component is learned using a convolutional network that includes the gradients of the data discrepancy and regulariser as input in each iteration. We present results of such a partially learned gradient scheme on a non-linear tomographic inversion problem with simulated data from both the Sheep-Logan phantom as well as a head CT. The outcome is compared against filtered backprojection and total variation reconstruction and the proposed method provides a 5.4 dB PSNR improvement over the total variation reconstruction while being significantly faster, giving reconstructions of 512 × 512 pixel images in about 0.4 s using a single graphics processing unit (GPU).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging
Jin, K. H., McCann, M. T., Froustey, E., & Unser, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2713099 · Cited by 2,529 · cited 1×
“An example demonstrating this approach for tomographic reconstruction is given in [20, 22].”
Method
Cited by
(2020) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58536-5_24 · Cited by 2,824
Deep D-Bar: Real-Time Electrical Impedance Tomography Imaging With Deep Neural Networks
Hamilton, S. J., & Hauptmann, A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2828303 · Cited by 365
Model-Based Learning for Accelerated, Limited-View 3-D Photoacoustic Tomography
Hauptmann, A., Lucka, F., Betcke, M., Huynh, N., Adler, J., Cox, B., Beard, P., Ourselin, S., & Arridge, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2820382 · Cited by 339
Self-citationShallow neural networks for fluid flow reconstruction with limited sensors
Erichson, N. B., Mathelin, L., Yao, Z., Brunton, S. L., Mahoney, M. W., & Kutz, J. N. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0097 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Adler, J., & Öktem, O.
- Venue
- Inverse Problems
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-11-22
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 124007
- ISSN
- 0266-5611 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6420
- OpenAlex
- W2607406448
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1361-6420/aa9581
- The paper
- Adler, J., & Öktem, O. (2017). Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networks. Inverse Problems. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/aa9581
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.