Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chemical and antibacterial effects of plasma activated water: correlation with gaseous and aqueous reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, plasma sources and air flow conditions

Machala, Z, Tarabová, B, Sersenová, D, Janda, M, Hensel, K·2019·Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics

Abstract

When cold atmospheric plasma comes into contact with water and biological media, antimicrobial or antitumor effects are induced, representing great potential for applications in biomedicine and agriculture. The need to control and tune the chemical composition and biomedical effects of plasma activated water/media (PAW/PAM) is emerging. By comparing two nonthermal air plasma sources, streamer corona and transient spark, interacting with water in open and closed reactors, and by enhancing the plasma–liquid interaction by water electrospray through these discharges, we demonstrate that the plasma gaseous products strongly depend on the discharge regime, its deposited power and gas flow conditions. The streamer corona strongly leads to the formation of ozone and hydrogen peroxide, while the more energetic transient spark leads to nitrogen oxides and hydrogen peroxide. The gaseous products then determine the chemical properties of the PAW and the dominant aqueous reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). The production of hydrogen peroxide depends on water evaporation and hydroxyl radical formation, which is determined by the discharge power. A transient spark produces higher concentrations of gaseous and aqueous RONS and induces stronger antibacterial effects than a streamer corona; however, the RONS production rates per joule of deposited energy are comparable for both studied discharge regimes. The net production rate per joule of gaseous nitrogen oxides strongly correlates with that of aqueous nitrites and nitrates. The antibacterial effects of the PAW tested on Escherichia coli bacteria are determined by the aqueous RONS: in the lower power streamer corona, this is ascertained mainly by the dissolved ozone and hydrogen peroxide, and in the higher power transient spark, by the combination of hydrogen peroxide, nitrite and acidic pH, while in the transient spark in the closed reactor it is determined by the acidified nitrites present.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6463/aae807

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Machala, Z., Tarabová, B., Sersenová, D., Janda, M., & Hensel, K.
Venue
Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
Published
2018-11-09
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
034002
ISSN
  • 0022-3727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6463
OpenAlex
W2897982875
Cited by
334
References
41
FWCI
15.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical and antibacterial effects of plasma activated water: correlation with gaseous and aqueous reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, plasma sources and air flow conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1361-6463/aae807
The paper
Machala, Z., Tarabová, B., Sersenová, D., Janda, M., & Hensel, K. (2019). Chemical and antibacterial effects of plasma activated water: correlation with gaseous and aqueous reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, plasma sources and air flow conditions. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aae807

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.