N, P, O-codoped biochar from phytoremediation residues: a promising cathode material for Li–S batteries
Open accessAbstract
Environment and energy are two key issues in today’s society. In terms of environmental protection, the treatment of phytoremediation residues has become a key problem to be solved urgently, while for energy storage, it tends to utilize low-cost and high specific energy storage materials (i.e. porous carbon). In this study, the phytoremediation residues is applied to the storage materials with low-cost and high specific capacity. Firstly, the phosphorous acid assisted pyrolysis of oilseed rape stems from phytoremediation is effective in the removal of Zn, Cu, Cd and Cr from the derived biochar. Moreover, the derived biochar from phytoremediation residues shows abundant porous structure and polar groups (–O/–P/–N), and it can deliver 650 mAh g −1 with 3.0 mg cm −2 sulfur , and keeps 80% capacity after 200 cycles when employing it as a sulfur host for lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. Hence, phosphorous acid assisted pyrolysis and application in Li–S battery is a promising approach for the disposal of phytoremediation residues, which is contributed to the environmental protection as well as energy storage.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A biochar composite co-doped with N, P, and O used as cathode for lithium sulfur battery had 80% of its discharge capacity remained following 200 cycles.
“Zhong et al. (2022) synthesized biochar composite co-doped with N, P, and O from waste biomass feedstock generated following phytoextraction of heavy metals. The as-formed composite was used as the cathode for lithium sulfur battery, which had 80% of its discharge capacity remained following 200 cycles.”
From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Zhong et al. (2022)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality
Wang, L., Deng, J., Yang, X., Hou, R., & Hou, D. (2023) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-023-00035-7 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhong, M., Sun, J., Shu, X., Guan, J., Tong, G., Ding, H., Chen, L., Zhou, N., & Shuai, Y.
- Affiliations
- Hunan Agricultural University (CN)
- Hunan University of Technology and Business (CN)
- Venue
- Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2022-02-28
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 215403
- ISSN
- 0957-4484 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6528
- OpenAlex
- W4210904680
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Scientific research and innovation project of Hunan Province (CX20210659)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21808053)
- Double first-class construction project of Hunan Agricultural University (SYL2019062)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- biochar, lithium-sulfur batteries, cathode materials, sulfur host, heavy metal removal, porous carbon, waste valorization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review