Cited by 5Advanced X-ray and CT ImagingBone health and osteoporosis researchMedical Imaging and Analysis

Quantitative assessment of areal bone mineral density using multi-energy localizer radiographs from photon-counting detector CT

Jasper, Sören, Swicklik, Joseph, Baffour, Francis, Ferrero, Andrea, El Sadaney, Ahmed O, Shanblatt, Elisabeth, Nowak, Tristan, McCollough, Cynthia +1 more·2024·Physics in Medicine & Biology

Abstract

Objective. To assess the accuracy and stability of areal bone-mineral-density (aBMD) measurements from multi-energy CT localizer radiographs acquired using photon-counting detector (PCD) CT. Approach. A European Spine Phantom (ESP) with hydroxyapatite (HA 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 g cm -2 ) was scanned using clinical PCD-CT and a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to compare aBMD values. To assess aBMD stability and reproducibility, PCD-localizers were acquired twice a day for one week, and once per week for five weeks. Multiple ESP anteroposterior thicknesses (18, 26, 34, and 40 cm) were achieved using a synthetic gel layer and scanned across eight tube current values for both 120 kV (15-120 mA) and 140 kV (10-80 mA). One-way analysis of variance was performed for statistical significance ( p In vivo performance of PCD-based aBMD was illustrated using a patient scan acquired at 140 kV and 40 mA, and lumbar aBMD values were compared with DXA. Main results. The ESP aBMD values from PCD-localizers demonstrated excellent day-to-day stability with a coefficient-of-variation ranging from 0.42% to 0.53%, with mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of less than 5% for all three vertebral bodies. The coefficient-of-variation for weekly scans ranged from 0.17% to 0.60%, again with MAPE below 5% for all three vertebral bodies. Across phantom sizes and tube currents, the MAPE values varied ranging from 1.84% to 13.78% for 120 kV, and 1.38%-9.11% for 140 kV. No significant difference was foun…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6560/ad8da1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two phantom studies using a clinically approved PCD-CT scanner confirmed these initial observations and showed accurate results in regard to aBMD quantification as compared with phantom specifications and with the clinical reference standard DXA.

    “More recently, 2 phantom studies using a clinically approved PCD-CT scanner confirmed these initial observations and showed accurate results in regard to aBMD quantification as compared with phantom specifications and with the clinical reference standard DXA.12,13”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jasper, S., Swicklik, J., Baffour, F., Ferrero, A., El Sadaney, A. O., Shanblatt, E., Nowak, T., McCollough, C., & Rajendran, K.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Siemens Healthcare (United States) (US)
  • Siemens (Germany) (DE)
Venue
Physics in Medicine & Biology
Published
2024-11-12
Volume
69
Issue
22
Pages
22NT01
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W4403932531
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
areal bone mineral density, photon-counting CT, material decomposition, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparison, measurement reproducibility, lumbar spine, tube current, low-dose imaging
MeSH terms
Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Photons, Durapatite, Phantoms, Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review