Quantitative assessment of areal bone mineral density using multi-energy localizer radiographs from photon-counting detector CT
Abstract
Objective. To assess the accuracy and stability of areal bone-mineral-density (aBMD) measurements from multi-energy CT localizer radiographs acquired using photon-counting detector (PCD) CT. Approach. A European Spine Phantom (ESP) with hydroxyapatite (HA 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 g cm -2 ) was scanned using clinical PCD-CT and a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to compare aBMD values. To assess aBMD stability and reproducibility, PCD-localizers were acquired twice a day for one week, and once per week for five weeks. Multiple ESP anteroposterior thicknesses (18, 26, 34, and 40 cm) were achieved using a synthetic gel layer and scanned across eight tube current values for both 120 kV (15-120 mA) and 140 kV (10-80 mA). One-way analysis of variance was performed for statistical significance ( p In vivo performance of PCD-based aBMD was illustrated using a patient scan acquired at 140 kV and 40 mA, and lumbar aBMD values were compared with DXA. Main results. The ESP aBMD values from PCD-localizers demonstrated excellent day-to-day stability with a coefficient-of-variation ranging from 0.42% to 0.53%, with mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of less than 5% for all three vertebral bodies. The coefficient-of-variation for weekly scans ranged from 0.17% to 0.60%, again with MAPE below 5% for all three vertebral bodies. Across phantom sizes and tube currents, the MAPE values varied ranging from 1.84% to 13.78% for 120 kV, and 1.38%-9.11% for 140 kV. No significant difference was foun…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two phantom studies using a clinically approved PCD-CT scanner confirmed these initial observations and showed accurate results in regard to aBMD quantification as compared with phantom specifications and with the clinical reference standard DXA.
“More recently, 2 phantom studies using a clinically approved PCD-CT scanner confirmed these initial observations and showed accurate results in regard to aBMD quantification as compared with phantom specifications and with the clinical reference standard DXA.12,13”
From In Vivo Bone Mineral Density Assessment With Spectral Localizer Radiographs From Photon-Counting Detector CT (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Moser, L. J., Klambauer, K., Diaz Machicado, M. C., Frey, D., Mergen, V., Eberhard, M., Nowak, T., Schmidt, B., Flohr, T., Distler, O., et al. (2025) · Investigative Radiology · doi:10.1097/rli.0000000000001159 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Jasper, S., Swicklik, J., Baffour, F., Ferrero, A., El Sadaney, A. O., Shanblatt, E., Nowak, T., McCollough, C., & Rajendran, K.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Siemens Healthcare (United States) (US)
- Siemens (Germany) (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physics in Medicine & Biology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2024-11-12
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 22NT01
- ISSN
- 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6560
- OpenAlex
- W4403932531
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- areal bone mineral density, photon-counting CT, material decomposition, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparison, measurement reproducibility, lumbar spine, tube current, low-dose imaging
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Photons, Durapatite, Phantoms, Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review