Cited by 45Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringECG Monitoring and AnalysisHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Detection of atrial fibrillation using a wrist-worn device

Open access
Sološenko, Andrius, Petrėnas, Andrius, Paliakaitė, Birutė, Sörnmo, Leif, Marozas, Vaidotas·2019·Physiological Measurement

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study proposes an algorithm for the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF), designed to operate on extended photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals recorded using a wrist-worn device of own design. APPROACH: Robustness against false alarms is achieved by means of signal quality assessment and different techniques for suppression of ectopic beats, bigeminy, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia. The decision logic is based on our previously proposed RR interval-based AF detector, but modified to account for differences between interbeat intervals in the ECG and the PPG. The detector is evaluated on simulated PPG signals as well as on clinical PPG signals recorded during cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. MAIN RESULTS: Analysis of the clinical signals showed that 1.5 false alarms were on average produced per day with a sensitivity of 72.0% and a specificity of 99.7% when 89.2% of the database was available for analysis, whereas as many as 15 when the RR interval-based AF detector, boosted by accelerometer information for signal quality assessment, was used. However, a sensitivity of 97.2% and a specificity of 99.6% were achieved when increasing the demands on signal quality so that 50% was available for analysis. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed detector offers promising performance and is particularly well-suited for implementation in low-power wearable devices, e.g. wrist-worn devices, with significance in mass screening applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6579/ab029c

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 45

Authors
Sološenko, A., Petrėnas, A., Paliakaitė, B., Sörnmo, L., & Marozas, V.
Affiliations
  • Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Sološenko, Andrius
  • Petrėnas, Andrius
Venue
Physiological Measurement
Published
2019-02-01
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
025003
ISSN
  • 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6579
OpenAlex
W2913995334
Cited by
45
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiological Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2016-03382)
  • Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba (S-MIP-17/81)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
atrial fibrillation detection, photoplethysmography, wrist-worn devices, wearable sensors, signal quality assessment, accelerometer, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, false alarm reduction, cardiac rehabilitation, myocardial infarction, mass screening, low-power devices
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Wrist, Photoplethysmography, Signal-To-Noise Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review