CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 227Physics of Superconductivity and MagnetismAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Topological order, emergent gauge fields, and Fermi surface reconstruction

Open access
Sachdev, Subir·2019·Reports on Progress in Physics
DOI 10.1088/1361-6633/aae110
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This review describes how topological order associated with the presence of emergent gauge fields can reconstruct Fermi surfaces of metals, even in the absence of translational symmetry breaking. We begin with an introduction to topological order using Wegner’s quantum gauge theory on the square lattice: the topological state is characterized by the expulsion of defects, carrying magnetic flux. The interplay between topological order and the breaking of global symmetry is described by the non-zero temperature statistical mechanics of classical XY models in dimension D = 3; such models also describe the zero temperature quantum phases of bosons with short-range interactions on the square lattice at integer filling. The topological state is again characterized by the expulsion of certain defects, in a state with fluctuating symmetry-breaking order, along with the presence of emergent gauge fields. The phase diagrams of the gauge theory and the XY models are obtained by embedding them in U(1) gauge theories, and by studying their Higgs and confining phases. These ideas are then applied to the single-band Hubbard model on the square lattice. A SU(2) gauge theory describes the fluctuations of spin-density-wave order, and its phase diagram is presented by analogy to the XY models. We obtain a class of zero temperature metallic states with fluctuating spin-density wave order, topological order associated with defect expulsion, deconfined emergent gauge fields, reconstructed Fermi surfaces (with ‘chargon’ or electron-like quasiparticles), but no broken symmetry. We conclude with the application of such metallic states to the pseudogap phase of the cuprates, and note the recent comparison with numerical studies of the Hubbard model and photoemission observations of the electron-doped cuprates. In a detour, we also discuss the influence of Berry phases, and how they can lead to deconfined quantum critical points: this applies to bosons on the square lattice at half-integer filling, and to quantum dimer models.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6633/aae110

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Berezinskii, 1971, Destruction of long-range order in one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a continuous symmetry group I. Classical systems, Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys., 32, 493
  2. Berezinskii, 1972, Destruction of long-range order in one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems possessing a continuous symmetry group. II. Quantum systems, Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys., 34, 610
  3. Sachdev, 1999, Translational symmetry breaking in two-dimensional antiferromagnets and superconductors, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 69, 1
  4. Wu, 2018, Pseudogap and Fermi-surface topology in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X, 8
  5. Scheurer, 2018, Orbital currents in insulating and doped antiferromagnets, 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235126 · DOI
  6. Polyakov, 1974, Particle spectrum in quantum field theory, JETP Lett., 20, 194

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 227

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sachdev, S.
ORCID
Sachdev, Subir
Venue
Reports on Progress in Physics
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2018-11-07
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
014001
ISSN
  • 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6633
DOI
10.1088/1361-6633/aae110
OpenAlex
W2888540086
Cited by
227
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 15
FWCI
12.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Reports on Progress in Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
topological order, emergent gauge fields, Fermi surface reconstruction, square lattice, XY model, Higgs phase, confining phase, single-band Hubbard model, spin density wave, deconfined quantum critical point, Berry phase, quantum dimer model, pseudogap phase, cuprate superconductors, electron-doped cuprates, quasiparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review