The DOI matches its Crossref record; 318 of the 318 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-lived particles at the energy frontier: the MATHUSLA physics case
Open accessAbstract
We examine the theoretical motivations for long-lived particle (LLP) signals at the LHC in a comprehensive survey of standard model (SM) extensions. LLPs are a common prediction of a wide range of theories that address unsolved fundamental mysteries such as naturalness, dark matter, baryogenesis and neutrino masses, and represent a natural and generic possibility for physics beyond the SM (BSM). In most cases the LLP lifetime can be treated as a free parameter from the m scale up to the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis limit of m. Neutral LLPs with lifetimes above 100 m are particularly difficult to probe, as the sensitivity of the LHC main detectors is limited by challenging backgrounds, triggers, and small acceptances. MATHUSLA is a proposal for a minimally instrumented, large-volume surface detector near ATLAS or CMS. It would search for neutral LLPs produced in HL-LHC collisions by reconstructing displaced vertices (DVs) in a low-background environment, extending the sensitivity of the main detectors by orders of magnitude in the long-lifetime regime. We study the LLP physics opportunities afforded by a MATHUSLA-like detector at the HL-LHC, assuming backgrounds can be rejected as expected. We develop a model-independent approach to describe the sensitivity of MATHUSLA to BSM LLP signals, and compare it to DV and missing energy searches at ATLAS or CMS. We then explore the BSM motivations for LLPs in considerable detail, presenting a large number of new sensitivity studies. While our discussion is especially oriented towards the long-lifetime regime at MATHUSLA, this survey underlines the importance of a varied LLP search program at the LHC in general. By synthesizing these results into a general discussion of the top–down and bottom-up motivations for LLP searches, it is our aim to demonstrate the exceptional strength and breadth of the physics case for the construction of the MATHUSLA detector.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agostinelli, S., Allison, J., Amako, K., Apostolakis, J., Araujo, H., Arce, P., Asai, M., Axen, D., Banerjee, S., Barrand, G., et al. (2003) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 · Cited by 25,106
Planck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 · Cited by 10,583
Sjöstrand, T., Mrenna, S., & Skands, P. (2006) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026 · Cited by 8,952
Alwall, J., Frederix, R., Frixione, S., Hirschi, V., Maltoni, F., Mattelaer, O., Shao, H.-S., Stelzer, T., Torrielli, P., & Zaro, M. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 · Cited by 7,579
Olive, K. A. (2016) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/10/100001 · Cited by 7,334
CPConservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles
Peccei, R. D., & Quinn, H. R. (1977) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.1440 · Cited by 7,026
Olive, K. A. (2014) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001 · Cited by 6,897
Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation
Mohapatra, R. N., & Senjanović, G. (1980) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.44.912 · Cited by 5,851
Self-citationSjöstrand, T., Ask, S., Christiansen, J. R., Corke, R., Desai, N., Ilten, P., Mrenna, S., Prestel, S., Rasmussen, C. O., & Skands, P. Z. (2015) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 · Cited by 5,462
A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1
Sjöstrand, T., Mrenna, S., & Skands, P. (2008) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.01.036 · Cited by 5,435
Metadata
- Authors
- Curtin, D., Drewes, M., McCullough, M., Meade, P., Mohapatra, R. N., Shelton, J., Shuve, B., Accomando, E., Alpigiani, C., Antusch, S., Carlos Arteaga-Velázquez, J., Batell, B., Bauer, M., Blinov, N., Salomé Caballero-Mora, K., Hyeok Chang, J., Chun, E. J., Co, R. T., Cohen, T., Cox, P., Craig, N., Csáki, C., Cui, Y., D’Eramo, F., Delle Rose, L., Bhupal Dev, P. S., Dienes, K. R., Dror, J. A., Essig, R., Evans, J. A., Evans, J. L., Fernández Tellez, A., Fischer, O., Flacke, T., Fradette, A., Frugiuele, C., Fuchs, E., Gherghetta, T., Giudice, G. F., Gorbunov, D., Gupta, R. S., Hagedorn, C., Hall, L. J., Harris, P., Carlos Helo, J., Hirsch, M., Hochberg, Y., Hook, A., Ibarra, A., Ipek, S., Jung, S., Knapen, S., Kuflik, E., Liu, Z., Lombardo, S., Lubatti, H. J., McKeen, D., Molinaro, E., Moretti, S., Nagata, N., Neubert, M., Miguel No, J., Olaiya, E., Perez, G., Peskin, M. E., Pinner, D., Pospelov, M., Reece, M., Robinson, D. J., Rodríguez Cahuantzi, M., Santonico, R., Schlaffer, M., Shepherd-Themistocleous, C. H., Spray, A., Stolarski, D., Subieta Vasquez, M. A., Sundrum, R., Thamm, A., Thomas, B., Tsai, Y., Tweedie, B., West, S. M., Young, C., Yu, F., Zaldivar, B., Zhang, Y., Zurek, K., & Zurita, J.
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-10-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 116201
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2809036207
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 318
- FWCI
- 27.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-lived particles at the energy frontier: the MATHUSLA physics case. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1361-6633/ab28d6
- The paper
- Curtin, D., Drewes, M., McCullough, M., Meade, P., Mohapatra, R. N., Shelton, J., Shuve, B., Accomando, E., Alpigiani, C., Antusch, S., Carlos Arteaga-Velázquez, J., Batell, B., Bauer, M., Blinov, N., Salomé Caballero-Mora, K., Hyeok Chang, J., Chun, E. J., Co, R. T., Cohen, T., . . . Zurita, J. (2019). Long-lived particles at the energy frontier: the MATHUSLA physics case. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab28d6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.