Structural damage identification using damping: a compendium of uses and features
Open accessAbstract
The vibration responses of structures under controlled or ambient excitation can be used to detect structural damage by correlating changes in structural dynamic properties extracted from responses with damage. Typical dynamic properties refer to modal parameters: natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping. Among these parameters, natural frequencies and mode shapes have been investigated extensively for their use in damage characterization by associating damage with reduction in local stiffness of structures. In contrast, the use of damping as a dynamic property to represent structural damage has not been comprehensively elucidated, primarily due to the complexities of damping measurement and analysis. With advances in measurement technologies and analysis tools, the use of damping to identify damage is becoming a focus of increasing attention in the damage detection community. Recently, a number of studies have demonstrated that damping has greater sensitivity for characterizing damage than natural frequencies and mode shapes in various applications, but damping-based damage identification is still a research direction 'in progress' and is not yet well resolved. This situation calls for an overall survey of the state-of-the-art and the state-of-the-practice of using damping to detect structural damage. To this end, this study aims to provide a comprehensive survey of uses and features of applying damping in structural damage detection. First, we present various methods for damping estimation in different domains including the time domain, the frequency domain, and the time-frequency domain. Second, we investigate the features and applications of damping-based damage detection methods on the basis of two predominant infrastructure elements, reinforced concrete structures and fiber-reinforced composites. Third, we clarify the influential factors that can impair the capability of damping to characterize damage. Finally, we recommend future research directions for advancing damping-based damage detection. This work holds the promise of (a) helping researchers identify crucial components in damping-based damage detection theories, methods, and technologies, and (b) leading practitioners to better implement damping-based structural damage identification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The damping model used for damping estimation is critical for damping-based methods.
“The damping model used for damping estimation is critical for damping-based methods [10].”
From Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019 (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis
Daubechies, I. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.57199 · Cited by 6,483 · see citing works
Los Alamos National Lab., N. (. S., Doebling, S., USDOE, W., Farrar, C., Prime, M., & Shevitz, D. (1996) · doi:10.2172/249299 · Cited by 2,899 · cited 3× · see citing works
“two decades can be categorized into two groups: local inspection methods [10] and global detection methods [8, 9].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hou, R., & Xia, Y. (2021) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures: A Comprehensive Review
Hassani, S., Mousavi, M., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22010153 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Effect of noise on output-only modal identification of beams
Jahangiri, G., Nabavian, S. R., Davoodi, M. R., Neya, B. N., & Mostafavian, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.10416 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cao, M. S., Sha, G. G., Gao, Y. F., & Ostachowicz, W.
- Affiliations
- Hohai University (CN)
- Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
- Venue
- Smart Materials and Structures
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-03-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 043001
- ISSN
- 0964-1726 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-665X
- OpenAlex
- W2564133672
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 11.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Smart Materials and Structures (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11132003)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Bladed Disk Vibration Dynamics
- Keywords
- structural damage detection, damping, damping estimation, modal parameters, natural frequencies, mode shapes, reinforced concrete structures, fiber-reinforced composites, time-frequency analysis, vibration response, damage sensitivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review