The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On entropy growth and the hardness of simulating time evolution
Open accessAbstract
The simulation of quantum systems is a task for which quantum computers are believed to give an exponential speed up as compared with classical ones. While ground states of one-dimensional systems can be efficiently approximated using matrix product states (MPS), their time evolution can encode quantum computations, so that simulating the latter should be hard classically. However, one might believe that for systems with high enough symmetry, and thus insufficient parameters to encode a quantum computation, efficient classical simulation is possible. We discuss supporting evidence to the contrary: we provide a rigorous proof of the observation that a time-independent local Hamiltonian can yield a linear increase of the entropy when acting on a product state in a translational invariant framework. This criterion has to be met by any classical simulation method, which in particular implies that every global approximation of the evolution requires exponential resources for any MPS-based method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, this fact is related to correlation and entanglement spreading according to the Lieb-Robinson theorem that states that, after a sufficiently large time, states can become strongly entangled ([91-96], see also [97]).”
From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [94]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions.
Porter, M., & Watson, G. N. (1923) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2300274 · Cited by 9,582
Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer
Shor, P. W. (1997) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539795293172 · Cited by 8,472
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions
Davis, H. T., & Watson, G. N. (1944) · National Mathematics Magazine · doi:10.2307/3030074 · Cited by 5,377
Subir Sachdev, A. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622540 · Cited by 3,675
The density-matrix renormalization group
Schollwöck, U. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.259 · Cited by 3,323
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088
Subir Sachdev, A. (1999) · Physics World · doi:10.1088/2058-7058/12/4/23 · Cited by 2,208
Efficient Simulation of One-Dimensional Quantum Many-Body Systems
Vidal, G. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.040502 · Cited by 1,779
Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits
Aaronson, S., & Gottesman, D. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052328 · Cited by 1,515
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hastings M, 2007, J. Stat. Mech., 2007, P08024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–113 of 113
Parameterized Hamiltonian simulation using quantum optimal controlPreprint
Kairys, P., & Humble, T. S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.02153 · Cited by 1
Fluctuations in multicomponent quantum fluids
Fernandes, L. (2024) · doi:10.63028/10067/2022500151162165141 · Cited by 1
(2020) · SciPost Physics Lecture Notes · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.1919
(2021) · SciPost Physics Lecture Notes · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.2445
(2020) · SciPost Physics Lecture Notes · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.1922
(2018) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.586
(2019) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.927
(2019) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.974
(2018) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.567
(2023) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.6886
(2023) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.6916
Mondal, S., Dutta, S., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/8y3g-jdjx
Solving Quantum Many-Body Problems on Quantum Computers
Martin, B. A. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/911dc194ze97bz42d2z8611z3daf90a7419c
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuch, N., Wolf, M. M., Vollbrecht, K. G. H., & Cirac, J. I.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-03-20
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 033032
- ISSN
- 1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970054335
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- entropy increase, classical simulation of quantum dynamics, quantum advantage, matrix product states, local Hamiltonians, translation invariance, product states, ground state, one-dimensional systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review