The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of correlation energies based on the random-phase approximation
Open accessAbstract
The random-phase approximation to the ground state correlation energy (RPA) in combination with exact exchange (EX) has brought the Kohn–Sham (KS) density functional theory one step closer towards a universal, 'general purpose first-principles method'. In an effort to systematically assess the influence of several correlation energy contributions beyond RPA, this paper presents dissociation energies of small molecules and solids, activation energies for hydrogen transfer and non-hydrogen transfer reactions, as well as reaction energies for a number of common test sets. We benchmark EX + RPA and several flavors of energy functionals going beyond it: second-order screened exchange (SOSEX), single-excitation (SE) corrections, renormalized single-excitation (rSE) corrections and their combinations. Both the SE correction and the SOSEX contribution to the correlation energy significantly improve on the notorious tendency of EX + RPA to underbind. Surprisingly, activation energies obtained using EX + RPA based on a KS reference alone are remarkably accurate. RPA + SOSEX + rSE provides an equal level of accuracy for reaction as well as activation energies and overall gives the most balanced performance, because of which it can be applied to a wide range of systems and chemical reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 · Cited by 4,155
Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry
Bartlett, R. J., & Musiał, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 · Cited by 3,343
Cited by
Random-phase approximation and its applications in computational chemistry and materials science
Ren, X., Rinke, P., Joas, C., & Scheffler, M. (2012) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6570-4 · Cited by 610
Self-citationThe GW approximation: content, successes and limitations
Reining, L. (2018) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1344 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Paier, J., Ren, X., Rinke, P., Scuseria, G. E., Grüneis, A., Kresse, G., & Scheffler, M.
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-04-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 043002
- ISSN
- 1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134459894
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of correlation energies based on the random-phase approximation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1367-2630/14/4/043002
- The paper
- Paier, J., Ren, X., Rinke, P., Scuseria, G. E., Grüneis, A., Kresse, G., & Scheffler, M. (2012). Assessment of correlation energies based on the random-phase approximation. New Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/4/043002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.