The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 4 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries
Open accessAbstract
We study the problem of charging a quantum battery in finite time. We demonstrate an analytical optimal protocol for the case of a single qubit. Extending this analysis to an array of N qubits, we demonstrate that an N-fold advantage in power per qubit can be achieved when global operations are permitted. The exemplary analytic argument for this quantum advantage in the charging power is backed up by numerical analysis using optimal control techniques. It is demonstrated that the quantum advantage for power holds when, with cyclic operation in mind, initial and final states are required to be separable.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper derives an analytical optimal protocol for charging a single-qubit quantum battery in finite time and extends it to arrays of N qubits. It shows that global entangling operations can yield an N-fold advantage in power per qubit over local parallel charging, even when initial and final states are separable.
Key findings
- For a single qubit, the power-optimal driving is along a geodesic at constant angular speed \(E_{\max}\), with no driving along the reference Hamiltonian direction.
- For an array of N qubits, global driving with the same maximum energy gap \(E_{\max}^{(N)}=N E_{\max}\) achieves an N-fold increase in power per qubit compared with parallel local driving.
- The quantum advantage persists under cyclic operation with separable initial and final states; entanglement appears only during the protocol.
- Numerical optimal control for full charging shows the minimum charging time scales as \(1/N\), and for a four-qubit solution entanglement across the 12–34 bipartition vanishes at the start and end.
Methods
- Analytical derivation for a single qubit using the von Neumann equation, Bloch-sphere parametrization, and optimization of a family of objective functions interpolating power and ergotropy under a trace-norm bound on the driving Hamiltonian.
- Extension to N-qubit arrays comparing parallel local driving with global entangling driving, with average work per qubit set to unity in the examples.
- Numerical optimal control for full charging of N qubits and for entanglement dynamics in a four-qubit numerical solution.
Limitations
- Stated: a full optimization over all possible unitary transformations is not analytically feasible, so the N-qubit advantage is demonstrated with a specific evolution.
- Stated: future work is needed to allow for degradation/purifying stages and to generalize the approach to open systems with noise and decoherence.
- Evident: the analysis assumes ideal cyclic unitary dynamics and purity preservation; no experimental implementation or realistic noise model is provided.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
11 No basis given · 5 Own result · 3 Own interpretation · 2 Not checked yet
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Extending this analysis to an array of N qubits, we demonstrate that an N-fold advantage in power per qubit can be achieved when global operations are permitted.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“Permitting for the same constraint as in the parallel case, that is E NE N max ( ) max = , an N-fold increase in power per qubit is achieved.”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, entangling processes, which allow for the creation of quantum correlations, can achieve a higher power than local operations.This is the case even when correlations are only allowed to appear during the process but not in the input and output states.”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > 1. Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We demonstrate an analytical optimal protocol for the case of a single qubit.”
- Also stated in: § 5. Conclusion · boosted
“In this article we have given a full derivation of a qubit protocol that achieves maximum power when charging a quantum battery-a work qubit-under constrained driving.”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > Abstract
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 5. Conclusion · boosted
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This can be regarded as pathological and it is worth pointing out that for 1 α < and θ π < the optimum is always reached for finite T.”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > 3. Powerful driving for a single qubit
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is demonstrated that the quantum advantage for power holds when, with cyclic operation in mind, initial and final states are required to be separable.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
“Interestingly, the advantage from correlations appears even though initial and final states are separable.”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > Abstract
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The optimal solution is found for the driving time T m that satisfies: ( ) ( ) E T E T E T cos sin cos . (15 ) m m m 0 m a x max 0 m a x 0 θ α θ θ + - + =”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > 3. Powerful driving for a single qubit
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“P E N (19 ) N max ( ) π 〈 〉 =”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > Additional information
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The solution corresponds, unsurprisingly perhaps, to driving along the geodesic with fixed r and t 0 ϕ ϕ = at constant angular speed E max , that is E t. (11 ) t 0 m a x θ θ = +”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > 3. Powerful driving for a single qubit
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The optimal protocol under the above constraint is found for v E v E v sin , cos , 0. (10 ) t x t t y t t z max max ϕ ϕ = - = =”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > 3. Powerful driving for a single qubit
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The average work in this process is again W N 〈 〉 = .”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > 4. Role of entanglement in charging an array of quantum batteries
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 3
- Probably not a substantial claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The work done is trivially W N 〈 〉 = -that is, the average work per qubit is unity and the driving time is T E par max π = .”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > 4. Role of entanglement in charging an array of quantum batteries
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It possesses N 1 + equidistant eigenvalues with the gap between the largest and the lowest eigenvalue given by NE max .”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > 4. Role of entanglement in charging an array of quantum batteries
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that at the beginning and at the end of the dynamics, the qubits are disentangled, indicated by vanishing entropies.”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > Additional information
hedgedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such infinitely powerful driving, however, would be in conflict with so-called quantum speed limits which bound the evolution time by the inverse mean energy (Margolus and Levitin 1998), or, alternatively, its variance (Mandelstam and Tamm 1945) and apply to time-dependent unitary evolution between any two quantum states (Deffner and Lutz 2013).”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > 2. Charging a quantum battery
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Margolus and Levitin 1998
- Not checked yetcites Mandelstam and Tamm 1945
- Not checked yetcites Deffner and Lutz 2013 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
All thermal states are passive.
“Note that all thermal states are passive.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, similar techniques have been employed to optimally charge a quantum battery [110,111].”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [110]
In the citing paper
“For comparison, it has been shown elsewhere that Γ C1 = √ k and Γ C2 = k are achievable if the total number of batteries N can be divided by k , i.e. , if N/k = s ∈ N [15, 36].”
From Enhancing the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“The Hamiltonian used in the example above, and in Ref. [15], to saturate the bound for quantum advantage involves N -body interactions.”
From Enhancing the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“The quantum advantage is tight for orthogonal initial and final states, due to the example given in Ref. [15].”
From Enhancing the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“In this particular case, such a speed-up can be obtained for pure states using the time-independent Hamiltonian H = √ s ∑ s µ =1 h µ , with h µ = | 1 〉 ⊗ k 〈 d | ⊗ k + h.c. , assuming that each h µ acts on a completely different set of k batteries, i.e. , [ h µ , h µ ′ ] = 0 ∀ µ, µ ′ .”
From Enhancing the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“The quantum advantage has been interpreted as the result of rapid evolution through the space of high-dimensional quantum states, typically obtained by means of global operations [15].”
From Enhancing the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > Additional information
“This is commensurate with the demand that all batteries be available for individual use at the final time with loss of purity.”
§ Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries > 4. Role of entanglement in charging an array of quantum batteries
“We define this-the condition that there is no reduction in the purity of the marginals at the end of the protocol-as the condition of no degradation.”
Citations
Cites
Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications
Marshall, A. W., Olkin, I., & Arnold, B. C. (2010) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68276-1 · Cited by 2,593
Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement
Bengtsson, I., & Zyczkowski, K. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535048 · Cited by 1,357
The maximum speed of dynamical evolution
Margolus, N., & Levitin, L. B. (1998) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00054-2 · Cited by 887
Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries
Alicki, R., & Fannes, M. (2013) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.87.042123 · Cited by 648
Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems
ALLAHVERDYAN, A. E., Balian, R., & Nieuwenhuizen, T. M. (2004) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/epl/i2004-10101-2 · Cited by 631
Passive states and KMS states for general quantum systems
Pusz, W., & Woronowicz, S. L. (1978) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01614224 · Cited by 530
Entanglement Generation is Not Necessary for Optimal Work Extraction
Hovhannisyan, K. V., Perarnau-Llobet, M., Huber, M., & Acín, A. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.240401 · Cited by 351
Thermodynamical proof of the Gibbs formula for elementary quantum systems
Lenard, A. (1978) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01011769 · Cited by 337
More bang for your buck: super-adiabatic quantum engines
Campo, A. D., Goold, J., & Paternostro, M. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06208 · Cited by 306
Self-citationTime-Optimal Quantum Evolution
Carlini, A., Hosoya, A., Koike, T., & Okudaira, Y. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.060503 · Cited by 301
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1103/physreve.91.032118 · DOI
- Mandelstam L, 1945, J. Phys. (USSR), 9, 249
- 10.1103/physrevlett.111.260501 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 475
Classical-driving-assisted qubit-array quantum battery
Wang, Z.-K., Xu, K. D., Wei, Z.-D., Han, W., Zhang, Y.-J., Man, Z., & Xia, Y. (2025) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.111.014121 · Cited by 5
Population and Energy Transfer Dynamics in an Open Excitonic Quantum Battery
Liu, Z., & Hanna, G. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29040889 · Cited by 5
Characterization of the Performance of an XXZ Three-Spin Quantum Battery
Chand, S., Ferraro, D., & Ziani, N. T. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27050511 · Cited by 5
Comparing Leggett–Garg inequality for work moments with Leggett–Garg inequality and NSIT
Zhang, Y., Zou, J., & Shao, B. (2020) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00194-1 · Cited by 5
Quantum speed limit for mixed states in a unitary system
Huang, J., Qin, L., Chen, G.-L., Hu, L., & Liu, F.-Y. (2022) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac76b4 · Cited by 5
Extractable energy from quantum superposition of current states
Perciavalle, F., Rossini, D., Polo, J., & Luigi Amico, A. (2025) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/adbf45 · Cited by 4
Nonreciprocal charging in a quantum battery via a mediator
Sun, C.-Z., Wang, Z.-K., Yan, W., Zhang, Y.-J., Man, Z., & Cai, Q.-Y. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/p93y-jflt · Cited by 5
Fast protocols for charging a three-spin-chain quantum battery
Evangelakos, V., Paspalakis, E., & Stefanatos, D. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-30354-1 · Cited by 4
Efficient charging of multiple open quantum batteries through dissipation and pumping
Dias, J., Wang, H., Nemoto, K., Nori, F., & Munro, W. J. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/jy9l-l8hv · Cited by 4
Quantum battery via reservoir engineering
Yang, J., Fang, S., Zhao, C., Shan, C., & Xiong, B. (2026) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/b5lx-j66h · Cited by 4
Zahia, A. A., Mashhor, L., Ahmed, M. M. A., & Obada, A. ‐. F. (2026) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-026-05120-5 · Cited by 4
Hadipour, M., Haseli, S., & Haddadi, S. (2024) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ad54ae · Cited by 4
Harnessing Nth Root Gates for Energy Storage
Fox, E. J., Herrera, M., Schmidt‐Kaler, F., & D’Amico, I. (2024) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e26110952 · Cited by 4
Scrambling in the charging of quantum batteries
Romero, S. V., Ding, Y., Chen, X., & Ban, Y. (2025) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2025)021 · Cited by 4
Measuring multipartite quantum correlations by thermodynamic work extraction
Yada, T., Yoshioka, N., & Sagawa, T. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/s8h3-5ptz · Cited by 4
Coupling a single spin to the motion of a carbon nanotube
Fedele, F., Cerisola, F., Bresque, L., Vigneau, F., Monsel, J., Tabanera-Bravo, J., Aggarwal, K., Dexter, J., Sevitz, S., Dunlop, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66331-5 · Cited by 4
Entanglement and energy transportation in central-spin quantum battery
刘, F. 帆. L., 杨, H.-Y. 慧. Y., 王, S.-L. 帅. W., 王, J.-Z. 俊. W., Zhang, K., & Wang, X.-H. (2024) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ad9a9d · Cited by 5
Collective preparation of large quantum registers with high fidelity
Buffoni, L., & Campisi, M. (2024) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/adc3bb · Cited by 2
Dicke–Ising quantum battery of an ion chain driven by a mechanical oscillator
Wen, J., Zheng, W., Peng, P., & Li, G.-Q. (2025) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/add50d · Cited by 5
Quantum resources for energy storage
Ferraro, D., Campisi, M., Andolina, G. M., Pellegrini, V., & Polini, M. (2020) · EPJ Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202023000003 · Cited by 4
Accumulation of spin-polarized states of charge carriers and a spintronic battery
Pastur, L. A., Slavin, V. V., & Yanovsky, A. V. (2020) · Low Temperature Physics · doi:10.1063/10.0001370 · Cited by 4
Shortest evolution path between two mixed states and its realization
Huang, J., Dong, S.-S., Chen, G.-L., Zhou, N., Liu, F.-Y., & Qin, L. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042405 · Cited by 4
Energy-invariant catalysis of stable ergotropy in strongly coupled spin-chain quantum batteries
Peng, Z.-Y., Zhao, S., Luo, L., & Zhuang, N.-Y. (2026) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2026.131462 · Cited by 5
Dichotomy in the effect of chaos on ergotropy
Sreeram, P. G., Kannan, J. B., Tekur, S. H., & Santhanam, M. S. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.054314 · Cited by 3
Impact of network architecture on the exciton dynamics in an open quantum battery
Khodadad, Z., Samimi, S., & Hanna, G. (2025) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0279627 · Cited by 3
Quantum Walks as a Tool to Design Robust Quantum Batteries: The Role of Topology and Chirality
Cavazzoni, S., Ragazzi, G., Bordone, P., & Paris, M. G. A. (2026) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202500897 · Cited by 4
Charge-Preserving Operations in Quantum Batteries
Malavazi, A. H. A., Ahmadi, B., Horodecki, P., & Dieguez, P. R. (2026) · PRX Energy · doi:10.1103/2jtp-jpkn · Cited by 3
Quantum advantage bounds for a multipartite Gaussian battery
Cavaliere, F., Ferraro, D., Carrega, M., Benenti, G., & Sassetti, M. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/r8v1-5xwf · Cited by 3
Enhancing Nonreciprocity through Squeezing-Induced Symmetry Breaking
Liu, B.-B., Wang, D.-Y., Tang, J., Chen, G., Jing, H., Su, S., & Nori, F. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/kh36-7z76 · Cited by 3
Stable energy transfer of noninteracting quantum charger-battery via photonic band gap
Wang, Z.-K., Xu, K. D., Yan, W., Man, Z., Zhang, Y.-J., & Xia, Y. (2025) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.111.024125 · Cited by 3
Zhang, J.-T., Liu, C.-G., & Ai, Q. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/rzgc-h78v · Cited by 3
A Review on Quantum Computing Approach for Next-Generation Energy Storage Solution
Khalid, A., Tufail, S., & Sarwat, A. I. (2021) · IEEE SoutheastCon · doi:10.1109/southeastcon45413.2021.9401854 · Cited by 3
Quantum speed-limited depletion of physical resources
Deffner, S. (2021) · doi:10.22331/qv-2021-06-04-55 · Cited by 3
Path distance of a quantum unitary evolution
Huang, J., Dong, S.-S., Chen, G.-L., Zhou, N., Liu, F.-Y., & Qin, L. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.022204 · Cited by 3
On the coupling of three-level quantum refrigerators in the weak coupling limit
Chakour, M. H. B. A., Allati, A. E., & Hassouni, Y. (2024) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ad341d · Cited by 3
Near-deterministic weak-value metrology via collective non-linearity
Vetrivelan, M., & Vinjanampathy, S. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac50fb · Cited by 3
Self-citationThe optimal estimation state of one-axis twisting model
Alhashash, A., Zidan, N., & METWALLY, N. (2020) · Optik · doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165934 · Cited by 3
Quantumness speeds up quantum thermodynamics processes
Luo, M. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109722 · Cited by 2
Eglinton, J., Carollo, F., Lesanovsky, I., & Brandner, K. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-09-26-1486 · Cited by 2
Role of energy-invariant assistants in energy extraction from quantum batteries
Chaki, P., Bhattacharyya, A., Sen, K., & Sen, U. (2026) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ae3ff5 · Cited by 2
Bound energy, entanglement and identifying critical points in 1D long-range Kitaev model
Mitra, A., & Srivastava, S. C. L. (2025) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/adf2d2 · Cited by 5
Upper bounds on charging power and tangible advantage in quantum batteries
Sreeram, P. G., Kannan, J. B., & Santhanam, M. S. (2026) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0313289 · Cited by 2
Kua, K. H., Serafini, A., & Genoni, M. G. (2025) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae2200 · Cited by 2
Enhanced charging power in nonreciprocal quantum battery by reservoir engineering
Lin, Q.-Y., Ye, G.-Z., Li, C., Su, W.-J., & Wu, H. (2025) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ae31bc · Cited by 2
Frozen and growing quantum work under noise: Coherence and correlations as key resources
Arjmandi, M. B. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/43vv-521p · Cited by 2
Multilevel quantum batteries: Large battery capacity and high charging speed
Huang, Z., Zhang, D., Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., Yu, Y., Jin, G., & Chen, A. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/qhz8-mvfb · Cited by 2
Experimental extraction and dynamics of ergotropy in open quantum systems
Gao, H.-X., Zhuang, X.-C., Xue, Q.-F., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y.-J., Xia, Y., & Man, Z. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/prsk-v1q2 · Cited by 2
Cluster Ising quantum batteries can mimic superextensive charging power
Pavone, A., Cavagnaro, F. L., Carrega, M., Grazi, R., Ferraro, D., & Ziani, N. T. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/rdhw-9kh3 · Cited by 2
Anonymous, Chen, X., & Ban, Y. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/j35s-xv5k · Cited by 7
Quach, J. Q., Virgili, T., Cerullo, G., McGhee, K. E., Ganzer, L., & Lidzey, D. G. (2020) · International Conference on Ultrafast Phenomena · doi:10.1364/up.2020.tu4a.1 · Cited by 2
Enhanced Charging in Common Environments Compared to Independent Environments for Two‐Level Systems
Xu, K. D., Chen, J., Li, H.-G., Zhu, H., Zhu, H., & Liu, W. (2022) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202200446 · Cited by 2
Correlations and energy in mediated dynamics
Krisnanda, T., Lee, S., Noh, C., Kim, J., Streltsov, A., Liew, T. C. H., & Paterek, T. (2022) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aca9ef · Cited by 2
Charging performance of quantum batteries based on intensity-dependent Dicke model
Huang, B.-Y., He, Z. W., & Chen, Y. (2023) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.72.20230578 · Cited by 2
A double quantum dot quantum battery controlled with a Markovian feedback
Bohórquez, O. (2024) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2024.130153 · Cited by 2
Tunable qubit quantum battery with delta-pulse driving
Ukhtary, M. S., & Rangkuti, C. N. (2025) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0245610 · Cited by 2
Photonic Energy‐Coherence Theorem and Experimental Validations
Yang, Y., Liu, X., Jiang, J., Chen, H., Yang, X., Qian, X., Fei, S., & Luo, M. (2025) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.202500326 · Cited by 2
Thermodynamics of Reduced State of the Field
Cusumano, S., & Rudnicki, Ł. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23091198 · Cited by 2
Optimal driving field for multipartite quantum battery coupled with a common thermal bath
杨, Z. Q. 梓. Y., Zhou, L., 周, Z. Y. 正. Z., 金, G. R. 光. J., 程, L. 龙. C., & 王, X. G. 晓. W. (2023) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/acdc12 · Cited by 2
Positive and non-positive measurements in energy distillation from quantum batteries
Chaki, P., Bhattacharyya, A., Sen, K., & Sen, U. (2026) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2026.132050 · Cited by 1
Symmetry Induced Enhancement in Finite-Time Thermodynamic Trade-Off Relations
Funo, K., & Tajima, H. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.080401 · Cited by 1
Zhang, X., Zhang, W., & Лю, Б. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202400683 · Cited by 1
The performance of quantum battery with Kerr medium
Yang, S., Hu, W., Tian, J., He, Z., & Qiu, L. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-025-04849-9 · Cited by 1
Molecular processes as quantum information resources
Sur, S., Chattopadhyay, P., & Kurizki, G. (2025) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0272970 · Cited by 1
Performance enhancement of a quantum battery via frequency detuning
Xie, Y.-X., Wang, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/adf51d · Cited by 1
Performance Analysis of a Two‐Mode Micromaser Quantum Battery
Mousavitaha, K. A., Singh, V., & Müstecaplıoğlu, Ö. E. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202500441 · Cited by 1
Quantum batteries: Unlocking the future of high-tech energy storage
Khadim, B., Majid, A., Belgibayeva, A., Jin, Y., Bulut, N., & AlKhedher, M. A. (2025) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.119249 · Cited by 1
Enhancing the performance of quantum battery by squeezing reservoir engineering
Li, Y., 刘, R.-F. 蓉. L., You, J.-B., 杨, W.-L. 万. Y., & 管, H. 桦. G. (2025) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ae1df2 · Cited by 1
Ergotropy of a Photosynthetic Reaction Center
Kalita, T., Sarmah, M. J., Akhtar, J., & Goswami, H. P. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c04818 · Cited by 1
Dimeric perylene-bisimide organic molecules: application as a quantum battery
Elghaayda, S., & Mansour, M. (2026) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ae3bc5 · Cited by 1
Non-Markovian nonreciprocal interactions in waveguide-based systems
Zheng, J., Cai, G., Li, P.-B., & Li, Y. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/fwdy-lccn · Cited by 1
NMR protocol for black-box ergotropy estimation via feedback algorithm
Joshi, J. A., & Mahesh, T. S. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/7pjs-146q · Cited by 1
Local thermal operations and classical communication
Bistroń, R., & Czartowski, J. (2026) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/s965-zwzm · Cited by 1
Yadav, M., Tiwari, D., & Banerjee, S. (2026) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ae4dcf · Cited by 1
Majumdar, M. G. (2026) · Discover Quantum Science · doi:10.1007/s44464-026-00012-0 · Cited by 1
Ergotropy, Rényi Mutual Information, and Steered Coherence in Quantum Batteries
Ye, B., Li, B., Wang, Z., & Fei, S. (2026) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202500717 · Cited by 1
Koutromanos, D., Stefanatos, D., & Paspalakis, E. (2026) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/m1gm-f9zy · Cited by 2
Superextensive charging speeds in a correlated quantum charger
Schmid, H., von Oppen, F., Refael, G., & Peng, Y. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/pkc6-c3pd · Cited by 2
Fundamental Limitations on the Reliabilities of Power and Work in Quantum Batteries
Mohan, B., Pandit, T., Lewenstein, M., & Bera, M. N. (2026) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/fnv6-yqmk · Cited by 1
Quantum evolution speed induced by Hamiltonian
Dong, S.-S., Qin, L., Liu, F.-Y., Gong, L.-H., & Huang, J. (2023) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.72.20231009 · Cited by 1
Engineering qubit dynamics in open systems with photonic synthetic lattices
Colandrea, F. D., Jaouni, T., Grace, J., Paneru, D., Arienzo, M., D’Errico, A., & Karimi, E. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.023236 · Cited by 1
Quantum energy preservation in a moving Heisenberg-ring quantum battery
Hao, X., Yan, C., Ren, T.-X., Tan, J. M., & Wu, Y. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-025-04847-x · Cited by 1
Coherent parallelization of universal classical computation
Pérez-Delgado, C. A., & Vinjanampathy, S. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac3a17 · Cited by 1
Self-citationStudy on energy extraction assisted with quantum correlated coherence in bath
Li, H., Zou, J. X., Shao, B., Chen, Y., & Hua, Z. (2019) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.68.20181525
Monsel, J. (2020) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54971-8_6
Charger-Mediated Quantum Batteries
Andolina, G. M., Farina, D., Mari, A., Polini, M., & Giovannetti, V. (2021) · Italian Quantum Information Science Conference (IQIS) · doi:10.3390/proceedings2019012060
Fluctuations in Extractable Work and Bounds on the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries
Wang, S.-Y. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23111455 · Cited by 4
Collective Effects in Hybrid Quantum Systems
Munro, W. J., Dias, J., & Nemoto, K. (2021) · Quantum science and technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6679-7_3
Limits of a rechargeable spin battery
Yanovsky, A. V., & Pyshkin, P. V. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.214407
Effects of the detection loophole on rival entanglement attestation techniques
Chaki, P., Sen, K., & Sen, U. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/drnv-m1nh
Experimental test of the Crooks fluctuation theorem in a single nuclear spin
Cheng, W. D., Liu, W., Niu, Z., Duan, C., Rong, X., & Du, J. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.l020401
Kamin, F. H., & Salimi, S. (2024) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1004642
Heating and cooling processes via phaseonium-driven dynamics of cascade systems
Amato, F., Pellitteri, C., Palma, G. M., Lorenzo, S., & Franco, R. L. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.043705
Comparing different operating regimes of a Dicke quantum battery
Gemme, G., Sassetti, M., & Ferraro, D. (2024) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749924500242
Enhancing Quantum Entanglement Through Parametric Control of Atom‐Cavity States
Vesperini, A., & Franzosi, R. (2024) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202400266
Zuo, J., Huang, S., Deng, L., & Chen, A. (2025) · Photonics · doi:10.3390/photonics12030177
Effects of interactions and boundary conditions on the performance of many-body quantum batteries
Zheng, Y.-D., Song, W.-L., & Zhou, B. (2025) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.111.054101
Amplification, mitigation and energy storage via constrained thermalization
Krishna, M., Shrotriya, H., Kwek, L. C., Narasimhachar, V., & Vinjanampathy, S. (2025) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/add55c
Self-citationA geometric quantum speed limit: Theoretical insights and photonic implementation
Wang, Q., Wang, B., Wang, J., & Zhang, L. (2025) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2691-9
Ultrafast charging quantum battery with cavity–cavity interactions
Wang, Z., Huang, Z., Zhang, D., Zhao, Y. L., Yu, Y., Jin, G., & Chen, A.-X. (2025) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/adfef9
Time-optimal control based on path distance
Du, L.-F., Qin, L., Guo, Q., Xu, X.-X., & Huang, J. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/mv26-qytj
Metadata
- Authors
- Binder, F. C., Vinjanampathy, S., Modi, K., & Goold, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Centre for Quantum Technologies (SG)
- Monash University (AU)
- The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT)
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2015-07-22
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 075015
- ISSN
- 1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1526062388
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 100 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 7.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation
- National Research Foundation Singapore
- Centre for Quantum Technologies
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
- Keywords
- quantum batteries, battery charging, optimal control, qubit arrays, global operations, charging power, separable states, cyclic operation, quantum advantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
