The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Casimir effect within scattering theory
Open accessAbstract
We review the theory of the Casimir effect using scattering techniques. After years of theoretical effort, this formalism is now largely mastered so that the accuracy of theory–experiment comparisons is determined by the level of precision and pertinence of the description of experimental conditions. Due to an imperfect knowledge of the optical properties of real mirrors used in the experiment, the effect of imperfect reflection remains a source of uncertainty in theory–experiment comparisons. For the same reason, the temperature dependence of the Casimir force between dissipative mirrors remains a matter of debate. We also emphasize that real mirrors do not obey exactly the assumption of specular reflection, which is used in nearly all calculations of material and temperature corrections. This difficulty may be solved by using a more general scattering formalism accounting for non-specular reflection with wavevectors and field polarizations mixed. This general formalism has already been fruitfully used for evaluating the effect of roughness on the Casimir force as well as the lateral Casimir force appearing between corrugated surfaces. The commonly used 'proximity force approximation (PFA)' turns out to lead to inaccuracies in the description of these two effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-20920-2 · Cited by 20,926
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2016) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315380476 · Cited by 13,921
Methods of Theoretical Physics
Morse, P. M., Feshbach, H., & Hill, E. L. (1954) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1933765 · Cited by 13,197
Methods of theoretical physics
Domenicali, C. A. (1954) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(54)90634-1 · Cited by 4,838
Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to6μmRange
Lamoreaux, S. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5 · Cited by 1,721
The theory of molecular attractive forces between solids
LIFSHITZ, E. M., & Hamermesh, M. (1992) · Perspectives in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-036364-6.50031-4 · Cited by 1,507
New developments in the Casimir effect
Bordag, M., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. M. (2001) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00015-1 · Cited by 1,479
Precision Measurement of the Casimir Force from 0.1 to0.9μm
Mohideen, U., & Roy, A. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.4549 · Cited by 1,199
Erratum: Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6μmRange [Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5 (1997)]
Lamoreaux, S. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5475 · Cited by 991
New Developments in the Casimir Effect
Bordag, M., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. M. (2001) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 913
Cited by
The Casimir force between real materials: Experiment and theory
Klimchitskaya, G. L., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. M. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1827 · Cited by 834
MICROSCOPE’s view at gravitation
Bergé, J. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acd203 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambrecht, A., Neto, P. A. M., & Reynaud, S.
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-10-20
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 243-243
- ISSN
- 1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075775885
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Casimir effect within scattering theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1367-2630/8/10/243
- The paper
- Lambrecht, A., Neto, P. A. M., & Reynaud, S. (2006). The Casimir effect within scattering theory. New Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/8/10/243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.