Cited by 93

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of atmospheric turbulence on entangled orbital angular momentum states

Gopaul, C, Andrews, R·2007·New Journal of Physics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/9/4/094

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nonuniform refractive index profiles caused by variations in temperature and pressure result in unwanted coupling within high-dimensional degrees of freedom in classical links and a loss of entanglement for quantum channels.

    “Nonuniform refractive index profiles caused by variations in temperature and pressure result in unwanted coupling within these high-dimensional DoFs in classical links (23–27) and a loss of entanglement for quantum channels (28–33)”

    From Topological robustness of optical skyrmions through a real-world free-space link (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Conclusions report that joint detection probabilities for entangled OAM photons decay as atmospheric turbulence increases and discuss the implications for quantum communication. The paper does not directly measure or establish a loss of entanglement itself. The classical-link coupling clause is attached to a different citation group and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.013601 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3313 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1364/OPEX.12.005448 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.153901 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ren X F, 2004, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 6, 243, 10.1088/1464-4266/6/4/008 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.052313 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.050301 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.043816 · DOI
  11. Fried D L, 1966, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 56, 1372, 10.1364/JOSA.56.001372 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gopaul, C., & Andrews, R.
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2007-04-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
94-94
ISSN
1367-2630
Cited by
93
References
3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review