The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on powder-based additive manufacturing for tissue engineering: selective laser sintering and inkjet 3D printing
Open accessAbstract
Since most starting materials for tissue engineering are in powder form, using powder-based additive manufacturing methods is attractive and practical. The principal point of employing additive manufacturing (AM) systems is to fabricate parts with arbitrary geometrical complexity with relatively minimal tooling cost and time. Selective laser sintering (SLS) and inkjet 3D printing (3DP) are two powerful and versatile AM techniques which are applicable to powder-based material systems. Hence, the latest state of knowledge available on the use of AM powder-based techniques in tissue engineering and their effect on mechanical and biological properties of fabricated tissues and scaffolds must be updated. Determining the effective setup of parameters, developing improved biocompatible/bioactive materials, and improving the mechanical/biological properties of laser sintered and 3D printed tissues are the three main concerns which have been investigated in this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering
CSIRO Molecular Science, B. 1., & Gunatillake, P. (2003) · European Cells and Materials · doi:10.22203/ecm.v005a01 · Cited by 1,765 · cited 1×
“An important synthetic biodegradable polymer material is polycaprolactone (PCL) This material is semi-crystalline with high thermal stability and a degradation period of approximately two years [43].”
Background
Cited by
3d printing technologies applied for food design: Status and prospects
Godoi, F. C., Prakash, S., & Bhandari, B. R. (2016) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.01.025 · Cited by 939
3D printing: Printing precision and application in food sector
Liu, Z., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B., & Wang, Y. (2017) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.018 · Cited by 858
Binder jetting: A review of process, materials, and methods
Ziaee, M., & Crane, N. B. (2019) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.031 · Cited by 819
Designing Biomaterials for 3D Printing
Guvendiren, M., Molde, J., Soares, R. M. D., & Kohn, J. (2016) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00121 · Cited by 732
Selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D printing of medicines
Fina, F., Goyanes, A., Gaisford, S., & Basit, A. W. (2017) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.082 · Cited by 577
Metadata
- Authors
- Shirazi, S. F. S., Gharehkhani, S., Mehrali, M., Yarmand, H., Metselaar, H. S. C., Adib Kadri, N., & Osman, N. A. A.
- Venue
- Science and Technology of Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-06-20
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 033502
- ISSN
- 1468-6996 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-5514
- OpenAlex
- W1545683735
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on powder-based additive manufacturing for tissue engineering: selective laser sintering and inkjet 3D printing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1468-6996/16/3/033502
- The paper
- Shirazi, S. F. S., Gharehkhani, S., Mehrali, M., Yarmand, H., Metselaar, H. S. C., Adib Kadri, N., & Osman, N. A. A. (2015). A review on powder-based additive manufacturing for tissue engineering: selective laser sintering and inkjet 3D printing. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/16/3/033502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
