Cited by 97Risk and Portfolio OptimizationFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesStochastic processes and financial applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the foundation of performance measures under asymmetric returns

Pedersen, Christian S, Satchell, Stephen E·2002·Quantitative Finance

Abstract

We examine two performance measures advocated for asymmetric return distributions: the Sortino ratio—originally introduced by Sortino and Price (Sortino F and Price L 1994 J. Investing 59–65)—and a measure based on power utility introduced in Leland (Leland H 1999 Financial Analysts J. 27–36). In particular, we investigate the role of the maximum principle in this context, and assess the conditions under which the measures satisfy it. Our results add further motivation for the use of a modified Sortino ratio, by placing it on a sound theoretical foundation. In this light, we discuss its relative merits compared with alternative approaches.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1469-7688/2/3/304

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Sortino ratio is more appropriate than the Sharpe ratio when returns are asymmetric, as it focuses on negative volatility.

    “This metric is more appropriate than the Sharpe ratio when returns are asymmetric, as it focuses on negative volatility (Sortino and Van der Meer, 1991; Pedersen and Satchell, 2002).”

    From StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets? (2025) · cites this paper as Pedersen and Satchell, 2002

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Ang A, 2000, NBER Working
  2. 10.1016/0304-405X(75)90025-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0304-405X(77)90017-4 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2327143 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0022-0531(70)90002-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1994.tb00315.x · DOI
  7. Fishburn P, 1977, Am. Econ. Rev., 67, 116
  8. 10.1287/mnsc.30.4.396 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0022-2496(82)90050-5 · DOI
  10. Fishburn P, 1979, Decision Theory, 10, 505, 10.1007/BF00126333 · DOI
  11. Franke G, 1997, Risk-value Efficient Frontiers and Asset Pricing
  12. 10.1093/rfs/2.3.393 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/2330813 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/rfs/6.3.595 · DOI
  15. Huang C, 1988, Foundations for Financial Economics
  16. Huang T, 2001, Derivatives Use, Trading and Regulation 7, No 1, 55
  17. Ingersoll J, 1987, Theory of Financial Decision Making
  18. 10.2307/3003029 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/BF02282046 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/13504869500000009 · DOI
  21. Krantz D, 1971, Foundations of Measurement I
  22. 10.2469/faj.v55.n1.2239 · DOI
  23. 10.2307/1924119 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/BF00135033 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0022-2496(86)90013-1 · DOI
  26. 10.2307/2975974 · DOI
  27. Menezes C, 1980, Am. Econ. Rev., 921
  28. Mossin J, 1969, Am. Econ. Rev., 59, 749
  29. Pedersen C, 1998, Empirical Tests for Differences in Equilibrium Risk-Measures with Application to Downside Risk in Small and Large UK Companies
  30. Pedersen C, 1999, Euro. J. Operational Res.
  31. Pedersen C, 1999, PhD Thesis
  32. Pedersen C, 2001, Derivatives Use, Trading and Regulation
  33. Pedersen C, 2000, J. Financial Quant. Anal.
  34. 10.2307/1907413 · DOI
  35. 10.2307/2329748 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/BF00126387 · DOI
  37. Satchell S, 1996, IFR Birkbeck College Discussion
  38. 10.2307/2977928 · DOI
  39. Sharpe W, 1996, J. Business, 119
  40. 10.3905/joi.3.3.59 · DOI
  41. 10.3905/jpm.1991.409343 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Treynor J, 1965, Harvard Business Rev., 63

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets?

    Chen, Y., Yao, Z., Liu, Y., Xin, A., Ye, J., Yu, J., Hou, L., & Li, J. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 62

    “…metric is more appropriate than the Sharpe ratio when returns are asymmetric, as it focuses on negative volatility (Sortino and Van der Meer, 1991; Pedersen and Satchell, 2002 After computing these metrics for each model, we derive a composite rank by leveraging the z-score of each metric,…”

Metadata

Authors
Pedersen, C. S., & Satchell, S. E.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Quantitative Finance
Published
2002-06
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
217-223
ISSN
  • 1469-7688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7696
OpenAlex
W1998506499
Cited by
97
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quantitative Finance (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Stochastic processes and financial applications
Keywords
performance indicators, Sortino ratio, asymmetric returns, downside risk, electric utilities, maximum principle, risk-adjusted performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review