The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electroweak baryogenesis and dark matter from a singlet Higgs
Open accessAbstract
If the Higgs boson H couples to a singlet scalar S via λ m | H | 2 S 2 , a strong electroweak phase transition can be induced through a large potential barrier that exists already at zero temperature. In this case properties of the phase transition can be computed analytically. We show that electroweak baryogenesis can be achieved using CP violation from a dimension-6 operator that couples S to the top-quark mass, suppressed by a new physics scale that can be well above 1 TeV. Moreover the singlet is a dark matter candidate whose relic density is ≲3% of the total dark matter density, but which nevertheless interacts strongly enough with nuclei (through Higgs exchange) to be just below the current XENON100 limits. The DM mass is predicted to be in the range 80–160 GeV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Piscopo, M. L., Spannowsky, M., & Waite, P. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.016002 · Cited by 117
Hamada, Y., Kawai, H., & Kawana, K. (2014) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x14500997 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Cline, J. M., & Kainulainen, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2013-01-08
- Volume
- 2013
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 012-012
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7516
- OpenAlex
- W2074713146
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.