The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting the axion bounds from the Galactic white dwarf luminosity function
Open accessAbstract
It has been shown that the shape of the luminosity function of white dwarfs (WDLF) is a powerful tool to check for the possible existence of DFSZ-axions, a proposed but not yet detected type of weakly interacting particles. With the aim of deriving new constraints on the axion mass, we compute in this paper new theoretical WDLFs on the basis of WD evolving models that incorporate the feedback of axions on the thermal structure of the white dwarf. We find that the impact of the axion emission into the neutrino emission can not be neglected at high luminosities M Bol ≲ 8) and that the axion emission needs to be incorporated self-consistently into the evolution of the white dwarfs when dealing with axion masses larger than m a cos 2 β≳ 5 meV (i.e. axion-electron coupling constant g ae ≳ 1.4 × 10 -13 ). We went beyond previous works by including 5 different derivations of the WDLF in our analysis. Then we have performed χ 2 -tests to have a quantitative measure of the agreement between the theoretical WDLFs — computed under the assumptions of different axion masses and normalization methods --- and the observed WDLFs of the Galactic disk. While all the WDLF studied in this work disfavour axion masses in the range suggested by asteroseismology m a cos 2 β≳ 10 meV; g ae ≳ 2.8 × 10 -13 ) lower axion masses can not be discarded from our current knowledge of the WDLF of the Galactic Disk. A larger set of completely independent derivations of the WDLF of the galactic disk as well as a detailed study of the uncertainties of the theoretical WDLFs is needed before quantitative constraints on the axion-electron coupling constant can be made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., Allard, F., Barman, T., Bodnarik, J. G., Hauschildt, P. H., Heffner‐Wong, A., & Tamanai, A. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428642 · Cited by 1,327
Cited by
The landscape of QCD axion models
Di Luzio, L., Giannotti, M., Nardi, E., & Visinelli, L. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002 · Cited by 657
Search for New Physics in Electronic Recoil Data from XENONnT
Aprile, E., Abe, K., Agostini, F., Ahmed Maouloud, S., Althueser, L., Andrieu, B., Angelino, E., Angevaare, J. R., Antochi, V. C., Antón Martin, D., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.161805 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertolami, M. M. M., Melendez, B. E., Althaus, L. G., & Isern, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-10-27
- Volume
- 2014
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 069-069
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7516
- OpenAlex
- W2074321436
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting the axion bounds from the Galactic white dwarf luminosity function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/069
- The paper
- Bertolami, M. M. M., Melendez, B. E., Althaus, L. G., & Isern, J. (2014). Revisiting the axion bounds from the Galactic white dwarf luminosity function. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.