Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 733

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The trouble with H0

Open access
Bernal, José Luis, Verde, Licia, Riess, Adam G.·2016·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

We perform a comprehensive cosmological study of the H0 tension between the direct local measurement and the model-dependent value inferred from the Cosmic Microwave Background. With the recent measurement of H0 this tension has raised to more than 3 σ. We consider changes in the early time physics without modifying the late time cosmology. We also reconstruct the late time expansion history in a model independent way with minimal assumptions using distance measurements from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Type Ia Supernovae, finding that at z < 0.6 the recovered shape of the expansion history is less than 5% different than that of a standard ΛCDM model. These probes also provide a model insensitive constraint on the low-redshift standard ruler, measuring directly the combination rsh where H0 = h × 100 Mpc−1 km/s and rs is the sound horizon at radiation drag (the standard ruler), traditionally constrained by CMB observations. Thus rs and H0 provide absolute scales for distance measurements (anchors) at opposite ends of the observable Universe. We calibrate the cosmic distance ladder and obtain a model-independent determination of the standard ruler for acoustic scale,rs. The tension in H0 reflects a mismatch between our determination of rs and its standard, CMB-inferred value. Without including high-ℓ Planck CMB polarization data (i.e., only considering the ``recommended baseline" low-ℓ polarisation and temperature and the high ℓ temperature data), a modification of the early-time physics to include a component of dark radiation with an effective number of species around 0.4 would reconcile the CMB-inferred constraints, and the local H0 and standard ruler determinations. The inclusion of the ``preliminary" high-ℓ Planck CMB polarisation data disfavours this solution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/10/019

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 90 references

Cited by

See all 733

Metadata

Authors
Bernal, J. L., Verde, L., & Riess, A. G.
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2016-10-01
Volume
2016
Issue
10
Pages
019-019
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W2498300276
Cited by
733
References
90
FWCI
32.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The trouble with H0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/10/019
The paper
Bernal, J. L., Verde, L., & Riess, A. G. (2016). The trouble with H0. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/10/019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.