The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear electrodynamics effects on the black hole shadow, deflection angle, quasinormal modes and greybody factors
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we discuss the effects of nonlinear electrodynamics (NED) on non-rotating black holes, parametrized by the field coupling parameter β and magnetic charge parameter P in detail. Particularly, we survey a large range of observables and physical properties of the magnetically charged black hole, including the thermodynamic properties, observational appearance, quasinormal modes and absorption cross sections. Initially, we show that the NED black hole is always surrounded by an event horizon and any magnetic charge is permissible. We then show that the black hole gets colder with increasing charge. Investigating the heat capacity, we see that the black hole is thermally stable between points of phase transition. Introducing a generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) with a quantum gravity parameter λ extends the range of the stable region, but the effect on temperature is negligible. Then we compute the deflection angle at the weak field limit, by the Gauss-Bonnet theorem and the geodesic equation, and find that even at the first order, the magnetic charge has a contribution due to the “field mass” term. Small changes of the charge contributes greatly to the paths of null geodesics due to the P 2 dependence of the horizon radius. Using a ray-tracing code, we simulate the observational appearance of a NED black hole under different emission profiles, thin disk and spherical accretion. We find that the parameter P has a very strong effect on the observed shadow radius, in agreement with the deflection angle calculations. We finally consider quasinormal modes under massless scalar perturbations of the black hole and the greybody factor. We find that the charge introduces a slight difference in the fundamental frequency of the emitted waveform. We find that the greybody factor of the NED black hole is strongly steepened by the introduction of increasing charge. To present observational constrains, we show that the magnetic charge of the M87* black hole is between 0 ≤ P ≤ 0.024 in units of M, in agreement with the idea that real astrophysical black holes are mostly neutral. We also find that LIGO/VIRGO and LISA could detect NED black hole perturbations from BHs with masses between 5 M ☉ and 8.0 · 10 8 M ☉. We finally show that for black holes with masses detected with LIGO so far, charged NED black holes would deviate from Schwarzschild by 5∼10 Hz in their fundamental frequencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 · Cited by 14,151
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106
GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., et al. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 · Cited by 9,473
First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole
The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., Alef, W., Asada, K., Azulay, R., Baczko, A.-K., Ball, D., Baloković, M., Barrett, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 · Cited by 4,205
Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities
Penrose, R. (1965) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.14.57 · Cited by 2,977
Folgerungen aus der Diracschen Theorie des Positrons
Heisenberg, W., & Euler, H. (1936) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01343663 · Cited by 2,833
Digital Spectral Analysis with Applications.
Porat, B., & Marple, S. L. (1988) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2008605 · Cited by 2,644
Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., & Starinets, A. O. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001 · Cited by 2,095
Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation
Kempf, A., Mangano, G., & Mann, R. B. (1995) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.1108 · Cited by 1,954
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1976) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01608497 · Cited by 1,871
Metadata
- Authors
- Okyay, M., & Övgün, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2022-01-01
- Volume
- 2022
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 009
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7516
- OpenAlex
- W3196042568
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 118
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear electrodynamics effects on the black hole shadow, deflection angle, quasinormal modes and greybody factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/009
- The paper
- Okyay, M., & Övgün, A. (2022). Nonlinear electrodynamics effects on the black hole shadow, deflection angle, quasinormal modes and greybody factors. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.