Cited by 11Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and AlgorithmsMachine Learning and Data Classification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A General Approach to Domain Adaptation with Applications in Astronomy

Open access
Vilalta, Ricardo, Gupta, Kinjal Dhar, Boumber, Dainis, Meskhi, Mikhail M.·2019·Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific

Abstract

The ability to build a model on a source task and subsequently adapt this model to a new target task is a pervasive need in many astronomical applications. The problem is generally known in the machine learning field as transfer learning , where domain adaptation is a popular scenario. An example is to build a predictive model on spectroscopic data to identify Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), while subsequently trying to adapt such a model to photometric data. In this paper we propose a new general approach to domain adaptation which does not rely on the proximity of source and target distributions. Instead we simply assume a strong similarity in model complexity across domains, and use active learning to mitigate the dependence on source examples. Our work leads to a new formulation for the likelihood as a function of empirical error using a theoretical learning bound; the result is a novel mapping from generalization error to a likelihood estimation. Results using two real astronomical problems, SN Ia classification and identification of Mars landforms, show two main advantages of our approach: increased performance accuracy and substantial savings in computational cost.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1538-3873/aaf1fc

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. [1]1. Abu-Mostafa, Y. S., Magdon-Ismail, M., & Lin, H.-T. 2012, Learning from data, Vol. 4 (Singapore: AMLBook)
  2. [2]2. Ando, R. K., & Zhang, T. 2005, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6, 1817 (http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v6/ando05a.html)
  3. [4]4. Basura, F., Habrard, A., Sebban, M., & Tuytelaars, T. 2013, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV, 2960
  4. [6]6. Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., & Pereira, F. 2006, in NIPS, ed. B. Schlkopf & J. Platt (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 137
  5. [7]7. Bickel, S., Brückner, M., & Scheffer, T. 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 10, 2137 (http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v10/bickel09a.html)
  6. [8]8. Blitzer, J., Krammer, K., Kulesza, A., Pereira, F., & Wortman, J. 2007, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS, 129
  7. [9]9. Blitzer, J., McDonald, R., & Pereira, F. 2006, in Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, ACL, 120
  8. [11]11. Bolstad, W. 2007, Introduction to Bayesian Statistics (2nd edn; New York: Wiley-Interscience)
  9. [13]13. Bruzzone, L., & Marconcini, M. 2010, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 32, 770
  10. [17]17. Courty, N., Flamary, R., Habrard, A., & Rakotomamonjy, A. 2017, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, ed. I. Guyon et al. (Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates Inc.), 3730
  11. [18]18. Daume, H., & Marcu, D. 2006, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 101
  12. [19]19. Dhar Gupta, K., Pampana, R., Vilalta, R., Ishida, E. E. O., & de Souza, R. S. 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, Ser. CIDM '16 (San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.), 61
  13. [20]20. Feigelson, E. 2017, in IAU Symp. 325, Astroinformatics (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 3
  14. [21]21. Finkel, J. R., & Manning, C. D. 2009, Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Ser. NAACL '09 (Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics), 602
  15. [22]22. Ganin, Y., Ustinova, E., Ajakan, H., et al. 2016, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17, 2096 (http://jmlr.org/papers/v17/15-239.html)
  16. [23]23. Germain, P., Bach, F., Lacoste, A., & Lacoste-Julien, S. 2016, arXiv:1605. 08636
  17. [24]24. Germain, P., Habrard, A., Laviolette, F., & Morvant, E. 2016, Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 48, Ser. ICML'16, 859
  18. [25]25. Glorot, X., Bordes, A., & Bengio, Y. 2011, Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 513
  19. [26]26. Gönen, M., & Margolin, A. A. 2014, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ser. AAAI'14 (AAAI Press), 1831
  20. [28]28. Grauman, K. 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Ser. CVPR '12 (Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society), 2066
  21. [31]31. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. 2001, The Elements of Statistical Learning, Ser. Springer Series in Statistics. (New York: Springer)
  22. [32]32. Haussler, D., Kearns, M., & Schapire, R. 1991, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Ser. COLT '91 (San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.), 61
  23. [35]35. Kanamori, T., Hido, S., & Sugiyama, M. 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 10, 1391 (http://www.jmlr.org/papers/v10/kanamori09a.html)
  24. [37]37. Kumar, A., Saha, A., & Daume, H. 2010, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23, ed. J. D. Lafferty et al. (Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc.), 478
  25. [38]38. Lewis, D. D., & Catlett, J. 1994, in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML, 148
  26. [39]39. Lewis, D. D., & Gale, W. A. 1994, in Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 3
  27. [40]40. Liu, B., Huang, M., Sun, J., & Zhu, X. 2015, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ser. IJCAI'15 (AAAI Press), 1277
  28. [41]41. Long, M., Wang, J., Ding, G., Pan, S. J., & Yu, P. S. 2014, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering, 26, 1076
  29. [42]42. Long, M., Wang, J., Ding, G., Sun, J., & Yu, P. S. 2013, in The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  30. [43]43. Long, M., Wang, J., Ding, G., Sun, J., & Yu, P. S. 2014, Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ser. CVPR '14 (Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society), 1410
  31. [46]46. Mansour, Y., Mohri., M., & Rostamizadeh, A. 2009, in Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Learning Theory, COLT
  32. [47]47. Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. 2010, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 22, 1345
  33. [48]48. Quinonero-Candela, J., Sugiyama, M., Schwaighofer, A., & Lawrence, N. D. 2009, Dataset shift in Machine Learning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
  34. [49]49. Raina, R., Ng, A. Y., & Koller, D. 2006, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, Ser. ICML '06 (New York: ACM) 713
  35. [50]50. Roy, D. M., & Kaelbling, L. P. 2007, Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, Ser. IJCAI'07 (San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.), 2599
  36. [52]52. Scheffer, T., Decomain, C., & Wrobel, S. 2001, International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis (Berlin: Springer), 309
  37. [55]55. Stepinski, T. F., Ghosh, S., & Vilalta, R. 2006, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Discovery Science, LNAI, 4265, 255
  38. [56]56. Stepinski, T., & Vilalta, R. 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2, 260
  39. [57]57. Sugiyama, M., Nakajima, S., Kashima, H., Buenau, P. V., & Kawanabe, M. 2008, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS, 1433

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Vilalta, R., Gupta, K. D., Boumber, D., & Meskhi, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • North American University (US)
Corresponding author
Vilalta, Ricardo
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Published
2019-09-09
Volume
131
Issue
1004
Pages
108008
ISSN
  • 0004-6280 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3873
OpenAlex
W2906579741
Cited by
11
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
domain adaptation, transfer learning, active learning (machine learning), generalization error, likelihood estimation, learning bounds, computational complexity reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review