The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This is the second part of the new evaluation of atomic masses, AME2020. Using least-squares adjustments to all evaluated and accepted experimental data, described in Part I, we derived tables with numerical values and graphs which supersede those given in AME2016. The first table presents the recommended atomic mass values and their uncertainties. It is followed by a table of the influences of data on primary nuclides, a table of various reaction and decay energies, and finally, a series of graphs of separation and decay energies. The last section of this paper provides all input data references that were used in the AME2020 and the NUBASE2020 evaluations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references*
Wang, M., Huang, W. J., Kondev, F. G., Audi, G., & Naimi, S. (2021) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf · Cited by 2,915
Self-citation
Cited by
The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references*
Wang, M., Huang, W. J., Kondev, F. G., Audi, G., & Naimi, S. (2021) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf · Cited by 2,915
Self-citationCODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018
Tiesinga, E., Mohr, P. J., Newell, D. B., & Taylor, B. N. (2021) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.025010 · Cited by 908
The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures*
Huang, W. J., Wang, M., Kondev, F. G., Audi, G., & Naimi, S. (2021) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddb0 · Cited by 436
Self-citationCODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2018
Tiesinga, E., Mohr, P. J., Newell, D. B., & Taylor, B. N. (2021) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/5.0064853 · Cited by 299
Wang, J.-R., Wu, J.-F., Zhang, T.-H., Liu, J.-L., Peng, J.-T., Wang, J.-W., Shen, Y., Wei, B.-R., Zou, Y.-M., & Tu, B.-S. (2025) · Nuclear Science and Techniques · doi:10.1007/s41365-025-01797-y · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, M., Audi, G., Kondev, F. G., Huang, W. J., Naimi, S., & Xu, X.
- Venue
- Chinese Physics C
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 030003
- ISSN
- 1674-1137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205606225
- Cited by
- 2,791
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 113.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030003
- The paper
- Wang, M., Audi, G., Kondev, F. G., Huang, W. J., Naimi, S., & Xu, X. (2017). The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chinese Physics C. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
