The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties *
Open accessAbstract
The NUBASE2020 evaluation contains the recommended values of the main nuclear physics properties for all nuclei in their ground and excited, isomeric (T 1/2 100 ns) states. It encompasses all experimental data published in primary (journal articles) and secondary (mainly laboratory reports and conference proceedings) references, together with the corresponding bibliographical information. In cases where no experimental data were available for a particular nuclide, trends in the behavior of specific properties in neighboring nuclei were examined and estimated values are proposed. Evaluation procedures and policies that were used during the development of this evaluated nuclear data library are presented, together with a detailed table of recommended values and their uncertainties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Isotopic compositions of the elements 2013 (IUPAC Technical Report)
Meija, J., Coplen, T. B., Berglund, M., Brand, W. A., De Bièvre, P., Gröning, M., Holden, N. E., Irrgeher, J., Loss, R. D., Walczyk, T., et al. (2016) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1515/pac-2015-0503 · Cited by 1,677
The Nubase evaluation of nuclear and decay properties
Audi, G., Bersillon, O., Blachot, J., & Wapstra, A. H. (2003) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.001 · Cited by 1,338
Self-citationThe NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties
Audi, G., Kondev, F. G., Wang, M., Huang, W. J., & Naimi, S. (2017) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001 · Cited by 593
Self-citationThe N evaluation of nuclear and decay properties
Audi, G., Bersillon, O., Blachot, J., & Wapstra, A. H. (1997) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(97)00482-x · Cited by 528
Self-citationRadioactive decays at limits of nuclear stability
Pfützner, M., Karny, M., Grigorenko, L. V., & Riisager, K. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.567 · Cited by 428
Evaluated experimental isobaric analogue states from T=1/2 to T=3 and associated IMME coefficients
MacCormick, M., & Audi, G. (2014) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.01.007 · Cited by 66
Self-citationRecommended values for β+ -delayed proton and α emission
Batchelder, J. C. (2020) · Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables · doi:10.1016/j.adt.2019.101323 · Cited by 12
Cited by
The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references*
Wang, M., Huang, W. J., Kondev, F. G., Audi, G., & Naimi, S. (2021) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf · Cited by 2,915
Self-citationThe AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures*
Huang, W. J., Wang, M., Kondev, F. G., Audi, G., & Naimi, S. (2021) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddb0 · Cited by 436
Self-citationShao, L. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28166053 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Kondev, F. G., Wang, M., Huang, W. J., Naimi, S., & Audi, G.
- Venue
- Chinese Physics C
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2021-03-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 030001
- ISSN
- 1674-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 2058-6132
- OpenAlex
- W3124757224
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 30.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties *. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae
- The paper
- Kondev, F. G., Wang, M., Huang, W. J., Naimi, S., & Audi, G. (2021). The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties *. Chinese Physics C. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
