Electrode-size dependent thresholds in subretinal neuroprosthetic stimulation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Retinal prostheses have shown promising results in restoring some visual perception to blind patients but successful identification of objects of different size remains a challenge. Here we investigated electrode-size specific stimulation thresholds and their variability for subretinal electrical stimulation. Our findings indicate the range of charge densities required to achieve identification of small objects and the object-size-specific scaling of stimulation threshold. APPROACH: Using biphasic voltage-limited current stimuli provided by a light-sensitive microchip, we determined threshold charge densities for stimulation with variable electrode sizes. The stimulated activation of the retinal network was identified by recording the spiking of retinal ganglion cells in photoreceptor-degenerated mouse rd10 retinas. Stimulation thresholds were determined for cells with saturating stimulus response relationships (SRRs) but not for cells characterized by monotonically increasing or decreasing SRRs. MAIN RESULTS: for an electrode diameter larger than 300 µm. This trend of decreasing threshold down to a plateau value was confirmed in wild-type mouse retina suggesting an underlying physiological source. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest the following guidelines for retinal prosthetics employing biphasic current pulses. The encoding of small objects may be achieved through the activation of a confined set of different retinal ganglion cells, with individual stimulation thresholds spanning a wide range of charge densities. The encoding of increasing object sizes may be achieved by decreasing stimulation charge density.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Smaller electrodes have higher charge density stimulation threshold and lower dynamic range, as shown in explanted retinas.
“Smaller electrodes have higher charge density stimulation threshold and lower dynamic range, as shown in explanted ratinas [160,161].”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [161]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Corna, A., Herrmann, T., & Zeck, G.
- Affiliations
- Natural and Medical Sciences Institute (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zeck, Günther
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-06-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 045003
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W2799562709
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1233)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- retinal prosthesis, subretinal stimulation, stimulation threshold, electrode size, charge density, biphasic current pulses, retinal ganglion cells, stimulus-response relationship, photoreceptor degeneration, visual perception
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Microelectrodes, Prosthesis Design, Retina, Extracellular Fluid, Mice, Visual Prosthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review