Cited by 42Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersTactile and Sensory Interactions

Electrode-size dependent thresholds in subretinal neuroprosthetic stimulation

Corna, Andrea, Herrmann, Thoralf, Zeck, Günther·2018·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Retinal prostheses have shown promising results in restoring some visual perception to blind patients but successful identification of objects of different size remains a challenge. Here we investigated electrode-size specific stimulation thresholds and their variability for subretinal electrical stimulation. Our findings indicate the range of charge densities required to achieve identification of small objects and the object-size-specific scaling of stimulation threshold. APPROACH: Using biphasic voltage-limited current stimuli provided by a light-sensitive microchip, we determined threshold charge densities for stimulation with variable electrode sizes. The stimulated activation of the retinal network was identified by recording the spiking of retinal ganglion cells in photoreceptor-degenerated mouse rd10 retinas. Stimulation thresholds were determined for cells with saturating stimulus response relationships (SRRs) but not for cells characterized by monotonically increasing or decreasing SRRs. MAIN RESULTS: for an electrode diameter larger than 300 µm. This trend of decreasing threshold down to a plateau value was confirmed in wild-type mouse retina suggesting an underlying physiological source. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest the following guidelines for retinal prosthetics employing biphasic current pulses. The encoding of small objects may be achieved through the activation of a confined set of different retinal ganglion cells, with individual stimulation thresholds spanning a wide range of charge densities. The encoding of increasing object sizes may be achieved by decreasing stimulation charge density.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/aac1c8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smaller electrodes have higher charge density stimulation threshold and lower dynamic range, as shown in explanted retinas.

    “Smaller electrodes have higher charge density stimulation threshold and lower dynamic range, as shown in explanted ratinas [160,161].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 42

Authors
Corna, A., Herrmann, T., & Zeck, G.
Affiliations
Natural and Medical Sciences Institute (DE)
Corresponding author
Zeck, Günther
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2018-06-06
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
045003
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2799562709
Cited by
42
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1233)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, subretinal stimulation, stimulation threshold, electrode size, charge density, biphasic current pulses, retinal ganglion cells, stimulus-response relationship, photoreceptor degeneration, visual perception
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Microelectrodes, Prosthesis Design, Retina, Extracellular Fluid, Mice, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review