Cited by 148Muscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Robust simultaneous myoelectric control of multiple degrees of freedom in wrist-hand prostheses by real-time neuromusculoskeletal modeling

Open access
Sartori, Massimo, Durandau, Guillaume, Došen, Strahinja, Farina, Dario·2018·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Objective . Robotic prosthetic limbs promise to replace mechanical function of lost biological extremities and restore amputees’ capacity of moving and interacting with the environment. Despite recent advances in biocompatible electrodes, surgical procedures, and mechatronics, the impact of current solutions is hampered by the lack of intuitive and robust man-machine interfaces. Approach . This work presents a biomimetic interface that synthetizes the musculoskeletal function of an individual’s phantom limb as controlled by neural surrogates, i.e. electromyography-derived neural activations. With respect to current approaches based on machine learning, our method employs explicit representations of the musculoskeletal system to reduce the space of feasible solutions in the translation of electromyograms into prosthesis control commands. Electromyograms are mapped onto mechanical forces that belong to a subspace contained within the broader operational space of an individual’s musculoskeletal system. Main results . Our results show that this constraint makes the approach applicable to real-world scenarios and robust to movement artefacts. This stems from the fact that any control command must always exist within the musculoskeletal model operational space and be therefore physiologically plausible. The approach was effective both on intact-limbed individuals and a transradial amputee displaying robust online control of multi-functional prostheses across a large repertoire of challenging tasks. Significance . The development and translation of man-machine interfaces that account for an individual’s neuromusculoskeletal system creates unprecedented opportunities to understand how disrupted neuro-mechanical processes can be restored or replaced via biomimetic wearable assistive technologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/aae26b

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 148

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [8]8. Jiang N, Dosen S, Muller K R and Farina D 2012 Myoelectric Control of Artificial Limbs: Is There a Need to Change Focus? [In the Spotlight] IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 29 150-2
  2. [24]24. Durandau G, Farina D and Sartori M Real-time musculoskeletal modeling driven by electromyograms IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
  3. [30]30. Sartori M, Llyod D G and Farina D 2016 Neural data-driven musculoskeletal modeling for personalized neurorehabilitation technologies IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 63 879-93
  4. [40]40. M. Sartori, G.V. Durandau, S. Došen, D. Farina. Model-based Myoelectric Prosthesis Control. Page 30 of 33 Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54 1940-50

Authors
Sartori, M., Durandau, G., Došen, S., & Farina, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • Aalborg University
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sartori, Massimo
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2018-10-22
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
066026
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2890243010
Cited by
148
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
myoelectric control, neuromusculoskeletal modeling, electromyography, transradial amputation, multi-degree-of-freedom control, human-machine interaction, motion artifacts, wearable assistive technology
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Amputees, Artificial Limbs, Computer Systems, Electromyography, Hand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Motor Skills, Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena, Prosthesis Design, Psychomotor Performance, Wrist, Artifacts, Biomimetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review