Cited by 34Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Virtual reality simulation of epiretinal stimulation highlights the relevance of the visual angle in prosthetic vision

Open access
Thorn, Jacob Thomas, Migliorini, Enrico, Ghezzi, Diego·2020·Journal of Neural Engineering

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Objective. Retinal prostheses hold the potential for artificial vision in blind patients suffering from outer retinal dystrophies. The optimal number, density and coverage of the electrodes that a retinal prosthesis should have to provide adequate artificial vision in daily activities is still an open question and an important design parameter needed to develop better implants. Approach. To address this question, we investigated the interaction between the visual angle, the pixel number and the pixel density without being limited by a small electrode count. We implemented prosthetic vision in a virtual reality environment in order to simulate the real-life experience of using a retinal prosthesis. We designed four different tasks simulating: object recognition, word reading, perception of a descending step and crossing a street. Main results. The results of our study showed that in all the tasks the visual angle played the most significant role in improving the performance of the participant. Significance . The design of new retinal prostheses should take into account the relevance of the restored visual angle to provide a helpful and valuable visual aid to profoundly or totally blind patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/abb5bc

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research using simulated prosthetic vision suggests that obtaining a wide field of view (FOV) is important for both mobility and object recognition tasks.

    “Research using simulated prosthetic vision suggests that obtaining a wide field of view (FOV) is important for both mobility and object recognition tasks.61–64”
  • The Polyretina team conducted experiments within virtual reality to assess perception under simulated epiretinal prosthetic vision.

    “The Polyretina team also conducted experiments within virtual reality to assess perception under simulated epiretinal prosthetic vision.64”
  • Wide artificial vision is crucial for totally blind people to perform everyday visual tasks such as general orientation, safe ambulation, obstacle avoidance and object recognition.

    “Wide artificial vision is crucial for totally blind people to perform everyday visual tasks such as general orientation, safe ambulation, obstacle avoidance and object recognition [41].”
  • For totally blind patients, such as in RP or severe forms of AMD, a much wider visual field would be required to allow the patient to perform everyday tasks.

    “For totally blind patients, like in RP or severe forms of AMD, a much wider visual field would be required to allow the patient to perform everyday tasks [41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 34

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Anon 2014 Chapter 1 -restoring vision to the blind: the new age of implanted visual prostheses Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 3 3

Authors
Thorn, J. T., Migliorini, E., & Ghezzi, D.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Ghezzi, Diego
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2020-10-01
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
056019
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W3084255170
Cited by
34
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Fondation E. Et G. Gelbert (NA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, epiretinal stimulation, visual angle, pixel density, electrode density, virtual reality simulation, artificial vision, blind patients, object recognition, word reading, retinal dystrophy
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Computer Simulation, Humans, Vision, Ocular, Visual Perception, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review