Cited by 124Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignNeural dynamics and brain function

The Argo: a high channel count recording system for neural recording in vivo

Open access
Sahasrabuddhe, Kunal, Khan, Aamir A, Singh, Aditya P, Stern, Tyler M, Ng, Yeena, Tadić, Aleksandar, Orel, Peter, LaReau, Chris +24 more·2021·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Objective. Decoding neural activity has been limited by the lack of tools available to record from large numbers of neurons across multiple cortical regions simultaneously with high temporal fidelity. To this end, we developed the Argo system to record cortical neural activity at high data rates. Approach. Here we demonstrate a massively parallel neural recording system based on platinum-iridium microwire electrode arrays bonded to a CMOS voltage amplifier array. The Argo system is the highest channel count in vivo neural recording system, supporting simultaneous recording from 65 536 channels, sampled at 32 kHz and 12-bit resolution. This system was designed for cortical recordings, compatible with both penetrating and surface microelectrodes. Main results. We validated this system through initial bench testing to determine specific gain and noise characteristics of bonded microwires, followed by in-vivo experiments in both rat and sheep cortex. We recorded spiking activity from 791 neurons in rats and surface local field potential activity from over 30 000 channels in sheep. Significance. These are the largest channel count microwire-based recordings in both rat and sheep. While currently adapted for head-fixed recording, the microwire-CMOS architecture is well suited for clinical translation. Thus, this demonstration helps pave the way for a future high data rate intracortical implant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/abd0ce

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approaches are being developed to improve throughput, sampling, biocompatibility and stability of MEAs.

    “Similarly, both in academic and industry settings, approaches are being developed to improve throughput, sampling, biocompatibility and stability of MEAs183–186.”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [186]

  • Next-generation recording devices are under development.

    “next-generation recording devices are under development35,36”

    From A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis (2023) · cites this paper as [36]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 124

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [39]Khan A, Sahasrabuddhe K, Pouzzner D, Nishimura K and Angle M 2018 Data pipeline for 65,536 channels of extracellular unit recordings 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Honolulu, HI, 2018, WeAT17.3.
  2. [74]Gierthmuehlen M, Wang X, Gkogkidis A, Henle C, Fischer J, Fehrenbacher T, Kohler F, Raab M, Mader I, Kuehn C, Foerster K, Haberstroh J, Freiman TM, Stieglitz T, Rickert J, Schuettler M and Ball T 2014 Mapping of sheep sensory cortex with a novel microelectrocorticography grid J. Comp. Neurol. 522 3590– 608 24851798

Authors
Sahasrabuddhe, K., Khan, A. A., Singh, A. P., Stern, T. M., Ng, Y., Tadić, A., Orel, P., LaReau, C., Pouzzner, D., Nishimura, K., Boergens, K. M., Shivakumar, S., Hopper, M. S., Kerr, B., Hanna, M.-E. S., Edgington, R. J., McNamara, I., Fell, D., Gao, P., Babaie-Fishani, A., Veijalainen, S., Klekachev, A. V., Stuckey, A. M., Luyssaert, B., Kozai, T. D. Y., Xie, C., Gilja, V., Dierickx, B., Kong, Y., Straka, M., Sohal, H. S., & Angle, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Rice University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ng, Yeena
  • Angle, Matthew R
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
015002
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W3113043584
Cited by
124
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5R43MH110287-02)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-17-C-4005)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
local field potentials, neural decoding, rat cortex
MeSH terms
Amplifiers, Electronic, Animals, Electrodes, Implanted, Microelectrodes, Neurons, Sheep, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review