Discrimination of simple objects decoded from the output of retinal ganglion cells upon sinusoidal electrical stimulation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Objective. Most neuroprosthetic implants employ pulsatile square-wave electrical stimuli, which are significantly different from physiological inter-neuronal communication. In case of retinal neuroprosthetics, which use a certain type of pulsatile stimuli, reliable object and contrast discrimination by implanted blind patients remained challenging. Here we investigated to what extent simple objects can be discriminated from the output of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) upon sinusoidal stimulation. Approach. Spatially confined objects were formed by different combinations of 1024 stimulating microelectrodes. The RGC activity in the ex vivo retina of photoreceptor-degenerated mouse, of healthy mouse or of primate was recorded simultaneously using an interleaved recording microelectrode array implemented in a CMOS-based chip. Main results. We report that application of sinusoidal electrical stimuli (40 Hz) in epiretinal configuration instantaneously and reliably modulates the RGC activity in spatially confined areas at low stimulation threshold charge densities (40 nC mm−2). Classification of overlapping but spatially displaced objects (1° separation) was achieved by distinct spiking activity of selected RGCs. A classifier (regularized logistic regression) discriminated spatially displaced objects (size: 5.5° or 3.5°) with high accuracy (90% or 62%). Stimulation with low artificial contrast (10%) encoded by different stimulus amplitudes generated RGC activity, which was classified with an accuracy of 80% for large objects (5.5°). Significance. We conclude that time-continuous smooth-wave stimulation provides robust, localized neuronal activation in photoreceptor-degenerated retina, which may enable future artificial vision at high temporal, spatial and contrast resolution.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sinusoidal electrical stimuli in epiretinal configuration allowed the classification of overlapping but spatially displaced objects in explanted retinas.
“Sinusoidal electrical stimuli in epiretinal configuration allowed the classification of overlapping but spatially displaced objects in explanted retinas [139].”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [139]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Corna, A., Ramesh, P., Jetter, F., Lee, M.-J., Macke, J. H., & Zeck, G.
- Affiliations
- TU Wien (AT)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Natural and Medical Sciences Institute (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zeck, Günther
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2021-06-17
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 046086
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W3164936596
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ 161L0059A)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1233)
- The authors acknowledge TU Wien Bibliothek for financial support through its Open Access Funding Programme.
- Germany’s Excellence Strategy (EXC-Number 2064/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- retinal prosthesis, retinal ganglion cells, object discrimination, visual object recognition, epiretinal stimulation, photoreceptor degeneration, artificial vision, stimulus contrast
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Humans, Microelectrodes, Retina, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review