Chronic histological effects of the flat interface nerve electrode
Open accessAbstract
The flat interface nerve electrode (FINE) is designed to reshape peripheral nerves into favorable geometries for selective stimulation. Compared to cylindrical geometries, the ovoid geometries created by the FINE allow more space for contact placement. Furthermore, the amount of electrically excitable tissue between stimulating contacts and target axons is reduced. In this study, the nerve response to the presence of the FINE is examined histologically. Three different FINEs were designed to reshape peripheral nerves to different opening heights designated as 'wide' (1.3 mm), 'medium' (0.5 mm) and 'narrow' (0.1 mm) cuffs. Twelve adult cats were implanted with one cuff each (four in total of each design) on their right sciatic nerves. At least 3 months later, the animals were sacrificed and their sciatic nerves were harvested for histological evaluation. Cross-sectional areas and eccentricities (defined as the major axis divided by the minor axis of the closest fit ellipse to a region) of the nerves were measured to assess the degree of reshaping. The wide and medium cuff designs significantly reshaped the nerves compared to control nerves, though there was no significant difference in eccentricity between nerves implanted with wide and medium cuffs. There was extensive deposition of connective tissue in the epineurium of all nerves implanted with cuffs. No significant difference in fiber counts was measured in any of the groups studied. Only nerves implanted with narrow cuffs showed evidence of axonal injury and/or demyelination. These results, coupled with stimulation selectivity measurements made on the same animals, suggest that safe, selective electrodes can be designed with ovoid geometries. Moderate reshaping caused no damage, while extreme reshaping generated mild-to-moderate nerve damage. It might be possible, however, to redesign the cuffs to slowly reshape the nerves.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The nerve can be reshaped significantly without long-term physiological or histological damage up to 3 months after implantation.
“The nerve can be reshaped significantly without long term physiological or histological damage up to 3 months after implantation (Leventhal et al., 2006).”
From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Leventhal et al., 2006
The Conclusions (page not provided) report significant nerve elongation and no observable physiological or histological damage over three months with wide and medium cuffs. The claim omits that restriction: narrow cuffs caused some nerve injury, and two animals with narrow cuffs did not remain functional throughout the period. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredModerate nerve reshaping with FINE implants does not seem to exert sufficient force to cause axon death or more connective tissue deposition than seen in wider nerve cuffs.
“While excessive compressive forces are associated with axonal death and increased FBR, moderate nerve reshaping with FINE implants does not seem exert sufficient force to cause axon death or more connective tissue deposition than seen in wider nerve cuffs (Tyler and Durand, 2003; Leventhal et al., 2006).”
From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Leventhal et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Leventhal, D. K., Cohen, M., & Durand, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-04-18
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102-113
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W2086917514
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- peripheral nerve stimulation, sciatic nerve, axonal injury, demyelination, connective tissue deposition, cross-sectional area, stimulation selectivity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cats, Chronic Disease, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Foreign-Body Reaction, Microelectrodes, Sciatic Nerve, Equipment Failure Analysis, Sciatic Neuropathy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review