Cited by 43Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchPain Management and Treatment

Chronic histological effects of the flat interface nerve electrode

Open access
Leventhal, Daniel K, Cohen, Mark, Durand, Dominique M·2006·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

The flat interface nerve electrode (FINE) is designed to reshape peripheral nerves into favorable geometries for selective stimulation. Compared to cylindrical geometries, the ovoid geometries created by the FINE allow more space for contact placement. Furthermore, the amount of electrically excitable tissue between stimulating contacts and target axons is reduced. In this study, the nerve response to the presence of the FINE is examined histologically. Three different FINEs were designed to reshape peripheral nerves to different opening heights designated as 'wide' (1.3 mm), 'medium' (0.5 mm) and 'narrow' (0.1 mm) cuffs. Twelve adult cats were implanted with one cuff each (four in total of each design) on their right sciatic nerves. At least 3 months later, the animals were sacrificed and their sciatic nerves were harvested for histological evaluation. Cross-sectional areas and eccentricities (defined as the major axis divided by the minor axis of the closest fit ellipse to a region) of the nerves were measured to assess the degree of reshaping. The wide and medium cuff designs significantly reshaped the nerves compared to control nerves, though there was no significant difference in eccentricity between nerves implanted with wide and medium cuffs. There was extensive deposition of connective tissue in the epineurium of all nerves implanted with cuffs. No significant difference in fiber counts was measured in any of the groups studied. Only nerves implanted with narrow cuffs showed evidence of axonal injury and/or demyelination. These results, coupled with stimulation selectivity measurements made on the same animals, suggest that safe, selective electrodes can be designed with ovoid geometries. Moderate reshaping caused no damage, while extreme reshaping generated mild-to-moderate nerve damage. It might be possible, however, to redesign the cuffs to slowly reshape the nerves.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/3/2/004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The nerve can be reshaped significantly without long-term physiological or histological damage up to 3 months after implantation.

    “The nerve can be reshaped significantly without long term physiological or histological damage up to 3 months after implantation (Leventhal et al., 2006).”

    From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Leventhal et al., 2006

    The Conclusions (page not provided) report significant nerve elongation and no observable physiological or histological damage over three months with wide and medium cuffs. The claim omits that restriction: narrow cuffs caused some nerve injury, and two animals with narrow cuffs did not remain functional throughout the period. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Moderate nerve reshaping with FINE implants does not seem to exert sufficient force to cause axon death or more connective tissue deposition than seen in wider nerve cuffs.

    “While excessive compressive forces are associated with axonal death and increased FBR, moderate nerve reshaping with FINE implants does not seem exert sufficient force to cause axon death or more connective tissue deposition than seen in wider nerve cuffs (Tyler and Durand, 2003; Leventhal et al., 2006).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 43

Authors
Leventhal, D. K., Cohen, M., & Durand, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2006-04-18
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
102-113
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2086917514
Cited by
43
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
peripheral nerve stimulation, sciatic nerve, axonal injury, demyelination, connective tissue deposition, cross-sectional area, stimulation selectivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Chronic Disease, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Foreign-Body Reaction, Microelectrodes, Sciatic Nerve, Equipment Failure Analysis, Sciatic Neuropathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review