Detection, eye–hand coordination and virtual mobility performance in simulated vision for a cortical visual prosthesis device
Open accessAbstract
In order to assess visual performance using a future cortical prosthesis device, the ability of normally sighted and low vision subjects to adapt to a dotted 'phosphene' image was studied. Similar studies have been conduced in the past and adaptation to phosphene maps has been shown but the phosphene maps used have been square or hexagonal in pattern. The phosphene map implemented for this testing is what is expected from a cortical implantation of the arrays of intracortical electrodes, generating multiple phosphenes. The dotted image created depends upon the surgical location of electrodes decided for implantation and the expected cortical response. The subjects under tests were required to perform tasks requiring visual inspection, eye-hand coordination and way finding. The subjects did not have any tactile feedback and the visual information provided was live dotted images captured by a camera on a head-mounted low vision enhancing system and processed through a filter generating images similar to the images we expect the blind persons to perceive. The images were locked to the subject's gaze by means of video-based pupil tracking. In the detection and visual inspection task, the subject scanned a modified checkerboard and counted the number of square white fields on a square checkerboard, in the eye-hand coordination task, the subject placed black checkers on the white fields of the checkerboard, and in the way-finding task, the subjects maneuvered themselves through a virtual maze using a game controller. The accuracy and the time to complete the task were used as the measured outcome. As per the surgical studies by this research group, it might be possible to implant up to 650 electrodes; hence, 650 dots were used to create images and performance studied under 0% dropout (650 dots), 25% dropout (488 dots) and 50% dropout (325 dots) conditions. It was observed that all the subjects under test were able to learn the given tasks and showed improvement in performance with practice even with a dropout condition of 50% (325 dots). Hence, if a cortical prosthesis is implanted in human subjects, they might be able to perform similar tasks and with practice should be able to adapt to dotted images even with a low resolution of 325 dots of phosphene.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some previous studies have used a model of cortical magnification or visuotopic mapping in their phosphene simulations.
“Some previous studies have used a model of cortical magnification (Srivastava et al., 2009; Paraskevoudi and Pezaris, 2021) or visuotopic mapping (Wong et al., 2010; Li, 2013) in their phosphene simulations.”
From Towards biologically plausible phosphene simulation for the differentiable optimization of visual cortical prostheses (2024) · cites this paper as Srivastava et al., 2009
Srivastava et al. developed a more biologically plausible simulation of phosphene vision that explicitly models the effect of cortical magnification for a specific electrode configuration.
“Srivastava et al. (Srivastava et al., 2007; Srivastava, et al., 2009) developed a more biologically plausible simulation of phosphene vision that explicitly models this effect of cortical magnification for a specific electrode configuration.”
From End-to-end optimization of prosthetic vision (2022) · cites this paper as Srivastava, et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Srivastava, N. R., Troyk, P. R., & Dagnelie, G.
- Affiliations
- Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-05-20
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 035008
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- PMC
- PMC3902177
- OpenAlex
- W2167308659
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (R01EY012843)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- cortical visual prosthesis, eye-hand coordination, wayfinding, low vision, intracortical electrodes, visual adaptation, gaze tracking, visual inspection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Hand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Movement, Phosphenes, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Perception, Biomimetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review