Cited by 3Heat Transfer and Numerical MethodsThermal properties of materialsThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measurement of thermal diffusivity with a modified Angstrom method

Open access
Piva, S·2025·Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Abstract

A methodology has been developed to measure the thermal diffusivity of high thermal conductivity solid materials. The basic idea traces back to the Ångström method, but the implementation differs in some points. Originally the specimen was free to the environment, here the specimen is thermally insulated to reduce, and control, the effects of natural convection. An appropriate analytical solution is used to calculate temperature distribution. The original two-point approach is replaced by a parameter estimation technique to consider multiple measurement points and reduce the final uncertainty. The methodology is used for a pure copper bar. The results are compared with the data available in the literature. The measured thermal diffusivity is 1.16±0.07·10−4 m2/s while the most reliable data available in the literature is 1.17±0.04·10−4 m2/s. The agreement of the present value with those available in the literature is excellent. This makes the use of this simple analytical approach attractive.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1742-6596/2940/1/012014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Mathew, 2022, J. Electronic Packaging, 144, 1
  2. Meysenc, 2005, IEEE Trans Power Electronics, 20, 687, 10.1109/TPEL.2005.846548 · DOI
  3. Abeles, 1960, J. Applied Physics, 31, 1585, 10.1063/1.1735897 · DOI
  4. D’Alessandro, 2022, Energies, 15, 8807, 10.3390/en15238807 · DOI
  5. Danielson, 1969, 3, 149
  6. Angstrom, 1861, Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 114, 513
  7. Pagliarini, 1991, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, 20, 533, 10.1080/10407789108944831 · DOI
  8. Eichhorn, 1964, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 7, 675, 10.1016/0017-9310(64)90160-7 · DOI
  9. Gandia, 1988, J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 21, 757, 10.1088/0022-3735/21/8/004 · DOI
  10. Leden, 1976, Automatica, 12, 445, 10.1016/0005-1098(76)90005-4 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Piva, S.
Affiliations
University of Ferrara (IT)
Corresponding author
Piva, S
Venue
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Published
2025-01-01
Volume
2940
Issue
1
Pages
012014
ISSN
  • 1742-6588 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-6596
OpenAlex
W4406902827
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics Conference Series (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Keywords
thermal diffusivity measurement, Angstrom method, thermal insulation, temperature distribution, parameter estimation, measurement uncertainty reduction, copper

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review