Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 747

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework

Open access
Belyaev, I, Brambach, T, Brook, N H, Gauvin, N, Corti, G, Harrison, K, Harrison, P F, He, J, Jones, C R, Lieng, M, Manca, G, Miglioranzi, S, Robbe, P, Vagnoni, V, Whitehead, M, Wishahi, J, the LHCb Collaboration·2011·Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Abstract

The LHCb simulation application, Gauss, consists of two independent phases, the generation of the primary event and the tracking of particles produced in the experimental setup. For the LHCb experimental program it is particularly important to model B meson decays: the EvtGen code developed in CLEO and BABAR has been chosen and customized for non-coherent B production as occuring in pp collisions at the LHC. The initial proton-proton collision is provided by a different generator engine, currently PYTHIA 6 for massive production of signal and generic pp collisions events. Beam gas events, background events originating from proton halo, cosmics and calibration events for different detectors can be generated in addition to pp collisions. Different generator packages as available in the physics community or specifically developed in LHCb are used for the different purposes. Running conditions affecting the generated events such as the size of the luminous region, the number of collisions occuring in a bunch crossing and the number of spill-over events from neighbouring bunches are modeled via dedicated algorithms appropriately configured. The design of the generator phase of Gauss will be described: a modular structure with well defined interfaces specific to the various tasks, e.g. pp collisions, particle decays, selections, etc. has been chosen. Different implementations are available for the various tasks allowing selecting and combining them as most appropriate at run time as in the case of PYTHIA 6 for pp collisions or HIJING for beam gas. The advantages of such structure, allowing for example to adopt transparently new generators packages, will be discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1742-6596/331/3/032047

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 747

Metadata

Authors
Belyaev, I., Brambach, T., Brook, N. H., Gauvin, N., Corti, G., Harrison, K., Harrison, P. F., He, J., Jones, C. R., Lieng, M., Manca, G., Miglioranzi, S., Robbe, P., Vagnoni, V, Whitehead, M., Wishahi, J., & the LHCb Collaboration
Venue
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Published
2011-12-23
Volume
331
Issue
3
Pages
032047
ISSN
  • 1742-6588 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-6596
OpenAlex
W2003418913
Cited by
747
References
1
FWCI
59.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1742-6596/331/3/032047
The paper
Belyaev, I., Brambach, T., Brook, N. H., Gauvin, N., Corti, G., Harrison, K., Harrison, P. F., He, J., Jones, C. R., Lieng, M., Manca, G., Miglioranzi, S., Robbe, P., Vagnoni, V, Whitehead, M., Wishahi, J., & the LHCb Collaboration. (2011). Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/331/3/032047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.