The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A New Measurement Method of Iimage Encryption
Open accessAbstract
Image scrambling transformation is applied widely in the digital watermarking and image encryption. Although more and more scrambling algorithms appear, they lack a method to evaluate the image scrambling degree. According to the relative differences of a point and adjacent point in scrambling front and back, a new method which judges the scrambling degree is proposed. Not only it can evaluate the change of each pixel's position, but also evaluate the change of adjacent pixel's value. Apply Matlab to the simulation experiment, the result indicated that this method can evaluate image scrambling degree well, and it accorded with people's vision too.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some other image encryption quality / randomness measurements [21, 40] also fail to include the property 4.”
From Local Shannon entropy measure with statistical tests for image randomness (2013) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1016/j.chaos.2003.12.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.imavis.2004.05.003 · DOI
- Arthur T B, 2001, J.The Math. Gazette, 108, 152
- 10.1109/30.920468 · DOI
- Lu Z T, 2005, J.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 44, 126
- Bai S, 2002, J.Comput. Eng. Appl., 38, 37
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Local Shannon entropy measure with statistical tests for image randomness
Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., Saveriades, G., Agaian, S., Noonan, J. P., & Natarajan, P. (2013) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2012.07.049 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, X. Y., Zhang, J., Ren, H. E., Li, S., & Zhang, X. D.
- Affiliations
- Harbin University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Northeast Forestry University (CN)
- Venue
- Journal of Physics: Conference Series
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 408-411
- ISSN
- 1742-6588 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-6596
- OpenAlex
- W1989786584
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Physics Conference Series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Keywords
- image scrambling, image encryption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
