Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Discrete Glimpses of the Physics Landscape after the Higgs Discovery

Ellis, John·2015·Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1742-6596/631/1/012001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the standard model of particle physics, the present vacuum state of the universe may not be stable but only metastable, with another lower energy state at high expectation values of the Higgs field.

    “Nevertheless, the recent discovery of the Higgs boson [1,2] raises the possibility that, even within the standard model of particle physics, the present vacuum state of the universe may not be stable, but only metastable, with another lower energy state at high expectation values of the Higgs field [3][4][5][6][7].”

    From Vacuum metastability with black holes (2015) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Aad G., 2012, Phys. Lett. B, 716
  2. Chatrchyan S., 2012, Phys. Lett. B, 716
  3. Aaij R., 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 151601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.151601 · DOI
  4. Aaij R., 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 191801, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.191801 · DOI
  5. Abazov V. M., 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 081801, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.081801 · DOI
  6. Aaltonen T., 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 87, 092002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.092002 · DOI
  7. Aad G., 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 052004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.052004 · DOI
  8. Aad G., 2013, Phys. Lett. B, 726, 120, 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.026 · DOI
  9. Ellis J., 2013, Phys. Lett. B, 726, 244, 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.007 · DOI
  10. Ellis J., 2012, JHEP, 1211
  11. Ellis J., 2013, Eur. Phys. J. C, 73, 2488, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2488-5 · DOI
  12. Ellis J., 2014, JHEP, 1404, 004, 10.1007/JHEP04(2014)004 · DOI
  13. Chatrchyan S., 2013, JHEP, 1306
  14. Ellis J., 2013, JHEP, 1306
  15. Blankenburg G., 2012, Phys. Lett. B, 712, 386, 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.05.007 · DOI
  16. Ellis J., 2014, JHEP, 1407
  17. Buttazzo D., 2013, JHEP, 1312
  18. Ade P. A. R., 2014, Astron. Astrophys., 571, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321569 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.201801 · DOI
  21. Ellis J. R., 2001, Phys. Lett. B, 506, 331, 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00156-3 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0370-2693(91)90863-L · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1815 · DOI
  24. Okada Y., 1991, Prog. Theor. Phys., 85, 1, 10.1143/PTP.85.1 · DOI
  25. Hahn T., 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 141801, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.141801 · DOI
  26. Ellis J. R., 2001, Phys. Lett. B, 515, 348, 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00823-1 · DOI
  27. Buchmueller O., 2014, Eur. Phys. J. C, 74, 2922, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2922-3 · DOI
  28. Buchmueller O., The pMSSM after LHC Run 1
  29. Ellis J. R., 2010, JHEP, 76, 115011
  30. Olive K. A., 2014, Chin. Phys. C, 38, 090001, 10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001 · DOI
  31. Buchmueller O., 2015, JHEP, 1501
  32. Bicer M., 2014, 1401, 164
  33. Ellis J., 2014, Eur. Phys. J. C, 74, 2947, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2947-7 · DOI
  34. Wess J., 1974, Phys. Lett. B, 49, 52, 10.1016/0370-2693(74)90578-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ellis, J.
Venue
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Published
2015-07-30
Volume
631
Pages
012001
ISSN
1742-6596
Cited by
12
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review