The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Launching the AquaMAV: bioinspired design for aerial–aquatic robotic platforms
Open accessAbstract
Current Micro Aerial Vehicles (MAVs) are greatly limited by being able to operate in air only. Designing multimodal MAVs that can fly effectively, dive into the water and retake flight would enable applications of distributed water quality monitoring, search and rescue operations and underwater exploration. While some can land on water, no technologies are available that allow them to both dive and fly, due to dramatic design trade-offs that have to be solved for movement in both air and water and due to the absence of high-power propulsion systems that would allow a transition from underwater to air. In nature, several animals have evolved design solutions that enable them to successfully transition between water and air, and move in both media. Examples include flying fish, flying squid, diving birds and diving insects. In this paper, we review the biological literature on these multimodal animals and abstract their underlying design principles in the perspective of building a robotic equivalent, the Aquatic Micro Air Vehicle (AquaMAV). Building on the inspire-abstract-implement bioinspired design paradigm, we identify key adaptations from nature and designs from robotics. Based on this evaluation we propose key design principles for the design of successful aerial-aquatic robots, i.e. using a plunge diving strategy for water entry, folding wings for diving efficiency, water jet propulsion for water takeoff and hydrophobic surfaces for water shedding and dry flight. Further, we demonstrate the feasibility of the water jet propulsion by building a proof-of-concept water jet propulsion mechanism with a mass of 2.6 g that can propel itself up to 4.8 m high, corresponding to 72 times its size. This propulsion mechanism can be used for AquaMAV but also for other robotic applications where high-power density is of use, such as for jumping and swimming robots.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RHex: A Simple and Highly Mobile Hexapod Robot
Saranli, U., Buehler, M., & Koditschek, D. E. (2001) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783640122067570 · Cited by 1,322
From Swimming to Walking with a Salamander Robot Driven by a Spinal Cord Model
Ijspeert, A. J., Crespi, A., Ryczko, D., & Cabelguen, J.-M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138353 · Cited by 1,214
Gliding and the Functional Origins of Flight: Biomechanical Novelty or Necessity?
Dudley, R., Byrnes, G., Yanoviak, S. P., Borrell, B., Brown, R. M., & McGuire, J. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110014 · Cited by 192
Cited by
Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones
Floreano, D., & Wood, R. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14542 · Cited by 1,476
Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review
Hassanalian, M., & Abdelkefi, A. (2017) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.04.003 · Cited by 1,454
The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics
Delmerico, J., Mintchev, S., Giusti, A., Gromov, B., Melo, K., Horvat, T., Cadena, C., Hutter, M., Ijspeert, A., Floreano, D., et al. (2019) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21887 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Siddall, R., & Kovač, M.
- Venue
- Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-03-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 031001
- ISSN
- 1748-3182 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-3190
- OpenAlex
- W2072094721
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Launching the AquaMAV: bioinspired design for aerial–aquatic robotic platforms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1748-3182/9/3/031001
- The paper
- Siddall, R., & Kovač, M. (2014). Launching the AquaMAV: bioinspired design for aerial–aquatic robotic platforms. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/9/3/031001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.