Decellularization for whole organ bioengineering
Open accessAbstract
Organ transplantation in an orthotopic location is the current treatment for end-stage organ failure. However, the need for transplantable organs far exceeds the number of available donor organs. As a result, new options, such as tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, have been explored to achieve functional organ replacement. Although there have been many advances in the laboratory leading to the reconstruction of tissue and organ structures in vitro, these efforts have fallen short of producing organs that contain intact vascular networks capable of nutrient and gas exchange and are suitable for transplantation. Recently, advances in whole organ decellularization techniques have enabled the fabrication of scaffolds for engineering new organs. These scaffolds, consisting of naturally-derived extracellular matrix (ECM), provide biological signals and maintain tissue microarchitecture, including intact vascular systems that could integrate into the recipient's circulatory system. The decellularization techniques have led to the development of scaffolds for multiple organs, including the heart, liver, lung and kidney. While the experimental studies involving the use of decellularized organ scaffolds are encouraging, the translation of whole organ engineering into the clinic is still distant. This paper reviews recently described techniques used to decellularize whole organs such as the heart, lung, liver and kidney and describes possible methods for using these matrices for whole organ engineering.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 221
- Authors
- Arenas-Herrera, J. E., Ko, I. K., Atala, A., & Yoo, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yoo, J J
- Venue
- Biomedical Materials
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2013-01-25
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 014106
- ISSN
- 1748-6041 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-605X
- OpenAlex
- W2009315388
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomedical Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Keywords
- extracellular matrix, organ regeneration, organ transplantation, vascular system, heart, lung, liver, kidney, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Cell Separation, Humans, Materials Testing, Heart Transplantation, Kidney Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Lung Transplantation, Organ Transplantation, Liver, Artificial, Bioartificial Organs, Tissue Scaffolds, Bioengineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review