The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flood extent mapping for Namibia using change detection and thresholding with SAR
Open accessAbstract
A new method for flood detection change detection and thresholding (CDAT) was used with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery to delineate the extent of flooding for the Chobe floodplain in the Caprivi region of Namibia. This region experiences annual seasonal flooding and has seen a recent renewal of severe flooding after a long dry period in the 1990s. Flooding in this area has caused loss of life and livelihoods for the surrounding communities and has caught the attention of disaster relief agencies. There is a need for flood extent mapping techniques that can be used to process images quickly, providing near real-time flooding information to relief agencies. ENVISAT/ASAR and Radarsat-2 images were acquired for several flooding seasons from February 2008 to March 2013. The CDAT method was used to determine flooding from these images and includes the use of image subtraction, decision-based classification with threshold values, and segmentation of SAR images. The total extent of flooding determined for 2009, 2011 and 2012 was about 542 km 2 , 720 km 2 , and 673 km 2 respectively. Pixels determined to be flooded in vegetation were typically <0.5% of the entire scene, with the exception of 2009 where the detection of flooding in vegetation was much greater (almost one third of the total flooded area). The time to maximum flooding for the 2013 flood season was determined to be about 27 days. Landsat water classification was used to compare the results from the new CDAT with SAR method; the results show good spatial agreement with Landsat scenes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoantennas for visible and infrared radiation
Biagioni, P., Huang, J.-S., & Hecht, B. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/2/024402 · Cited by 975
Martinis, S., Twele, A., & Voigt, S. (2009) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-9-303-2009 · Cited by 479
Radar detection of flooding beneath the forest canopy: a review
Hess, L. L., Melack, J. M., & Simonett, D. S. (1990) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431169008955095 · Cited by 396
Towards an automated SAR-based flood monitoring system: Lessons learned from two case studies
Matgen, P., Hostache, R., Schumann, G., Pfister, L., Hoffmann, L., & Savenije, H. H. G. (2011) · Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C · doi:10.1016/j.pce.2010.12.009 · Cited by 394
Envisat multi‐polarized ASAR data for flood mapping
Henry, J. ‐., Chastanet, P., Fellah, K., & Desnos, Y. ‐. (2006) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160500486724 · Cited by 287
Horritt, M. S., Mason, D. C., & Luckman, A. J. (2001) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160116902 · Cited by 274
Modeling floodplain inundation using an integrated GIS with radar and optical remote sensing
Townsend, P. A., & Walsh, S. J. (1998) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/s0169-555x(97)00069-x · Cited by 271
Antenna–load interactions at optical frequencies: impedance matching to quantum systems
Olmon, R. L., & Raschke, M. B. (2012) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/23/44/444001 · Cited by 220
High-Resolution 3-D Flood Information From Radar Imagery for Flood Hazard Management
Schumann, G., Hostache, R., Puech, C., Hoffmann, L., Matgen, P., Pappenberger, F., & Pfister, L. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2006.888103 · Cited by 186
Moore, A. E., Cotterill, F. P. D., Main, M. P. L., et al. (2007) · Large Rivers · doi:10.1002/9780470723722.ch15 · Cited by 98
Cited by
DeVries, B., Huang, C., Armston, J., Huang, W., Jones, J. W., & Lang, M. W. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111664 · Cited by 518
A review of remote sensing applications for water security: Quantity, quality, and extremes
Chawla, I., Karthikeyan, L., & Mishra, A. K. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124826 · Cited by 363
Tanim, A. H., Goharian, E., & Moradkhani, H. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15237-z · Cited by 88
Psomiadis, E., Diakakis, M., & Soulis, K. X. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12233980 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, S., Fatoyinbo, T. E., & Policelli, F.
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-03-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 035002
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158776858
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flood extent mapping for Namibia using change detection and thresholding with SAR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035002
- The paper
- Long, S., Fatoyinbo, T. E., & Policelli, F. (2014). Flood extent mapping for Namibia using change detection and thresholding with SAR. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.