Cited by 32Climate variability and modelsClimate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change and Environmental Impact

Are the impacts of land use on warming underestimated in climate policy?

Open access
Mahowald, Natalie M, Ward, Daniel S, Doney, Scott C, Hess, Peter G, Randerson, James T·2017·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

While carbon dioxide emissions from energy use must be the primary target of climate change mitigation efforts, land use and land cover change (LULCC) also represent an important source of climate forcing. In this study we compute time series of global surface temperature change separately for LULCC and non-LULCC sources (primarily fossil fuel burning), and show that because of the extra warming associated with the co-emission of methane and nitrous oxide with LULCC carbon dioxide emissions, and a co-emission of cooling aerosols with non-LULCC emissions of carbon dioxide, the linear relationship between cumulative carbon dioxide emissions and temperature has a two-fold higher slope for LULCC than for non-LULCC activities. Moreover, projections used in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for the rate of tropical land conversion in the future are relatively low compared to contemporary observations, suggesting that the future projections of land conversion used in the IPCC may underestimate potential impacts of LULCC. By including a ‘business as usual’ future LULCC scenario for tropical deforestation, we find that even if all non-LULCC emissions are switched off in 2015, it is likely that 1.5 °C of warming relative to the preindustrial era will occur by 2100. Thus, policies to reduce LULCC emissions must remain a high priority if we are to achieve the low to medium temperature change targets proposed as a part of the Paris Agreement. Future studies using integrated assessment models and other climate simulations should include more realistic deforestation rates and the integration of policy that would reduce LULCC emissions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/aa836d

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall, land use by humans is estimated to be responsible for about a quarter of global GHG emissions, and this may be an underestimate.

    “Overall, land use by humans is estimated to be responsible for about a quarter of global GHG emissions [370] (and this may be an underestimate [511]).”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [511]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 32

Authors
Mahowald, N. M., Ward, D. S., Doney, S. C., Hess, P. G., & Randerson, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Mahowald, Natalie M
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
094016
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2744985939
Cited by
32
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CCF-1522054)
  • US Department of Energy (DOE-SC0016362)
  • Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences (ATM1049033)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Keywords
land use and land cover change, tropical deforestation, radiative forcing, methane emissions, nitrous oxide emissions, 1.5 °C warming target, Paris Agreement, climate policy, business-as-usual scenario

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review