Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling
Open accessAbstract
We assess the literature on innovation and upscaling for negative emissions technologies (NETs) using a systematic and reproducible literature coding procedure.To structure our review, we employ the framework of sequential stages in the innovation process, with which we code each NETs article in innovation space.We find that while there is a growing body of innovation literature on NETs, 59% of the articles are focused on the earliest stages of the innovation process, 'research and development' (R&D).The subsequent stages of innovation are also represented in the literature, but at much lower levels of activity than R&D.Distinguishing between innovation stages that are related to the supply of the technology (R&D, demonstrations, scale up) and demand for the technology (demand pull, niche markets, public acceptance), we find an overwhelming emphasis (83%) on the supply side.BECCS articles have an above average share of demand-side articles while direct air carbon capture and storage has a very low share.Innovation in NETs has much to learn from successfully diffused technologies; appealing to heterogeneous users, managing policy risk, as well as understanding and addressing public concerns are all crucial yet not well represented in the extant literature.Results from integrated assessment models show that while NETs play a key role in the second half of the 21st century for 1.5 • C and 2 • C scenarios, the major period of new NETs deployment is between 2030 and 2050.Given that the broader innovation literature consistently finds long time periods involved in scaling up and deploying novel technologies, there is an urgency to developing NETs that is largely unappreciated.This challenge is exacerbated by the thousands to millions of actors that potentially need to adopt these technologies for them to achieve planetary scale.This urgency is reflected neither in the Paris Agreement nor in most of the literature we review here.If NETs are to be deployed at the levels required to meet 1.5 • C and 2 • C targets, then important post-R&D issues will need to be addressed in the literature, including incentives for early deployment, niche markets, scale-up, demand, and-particularly if deployment is to be hastened-public acceptance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although there has been significant progress in negative emissions research, the actual CO2 removal industry is still in its infancy.
“Although there has been significant progress in negative emissions research [260,540,575,580,707], the actual CO 2 removal industry is still in its infancy.”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [580]
Current research on NETs has come from two main strands: technology-focused studies and integrated assessment models.
“Current research on NETs has come from two main strands: technology-focused studies that explore specific technical configurations, and integrated assessment models that investigate NETs in the context of global and long-term climate change mitigation.[3][4][5]”
From The mutual dependence of negative emission technologies and energy systems (2019) · cites this paper as [5]
DACCS is a modular technology that may be implemented in diverse settings and hence is most likely subject to considerable cost reductions.
“In contrast, DACCS is a modular technology that may be implemented in diverse setting and hence is most likely subject to considerable cost reductions.5,55”
From The mutual dependence of negative emission technologies and energy systems (2019) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 323 · Cited by 343
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Woolf D, Lehmann J, Cowie A, Cayuela M L, Whitman T and Sohi S Advances in Soil Science: Soil and Climate ed R Lal (Berlin: Springer)
- Authors
- Nemet, G. F., Callaghan, M. W., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Hartmann, J., Hilaire, J., Lamb, W. F., Minx, J. C., Rogers, S., & Smith, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (DE)
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nemet, Gregory F
- ORCID
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-05-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 063003
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2804836376
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 323
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 9 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 52.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Carnegie Corporation of New York
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CEMICS2, DFG EXEC 177, DFG SPP 1689, SPP 1689)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013200/1)
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/P019455/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Keywords
- negative emissions technologies, innovation process, technology upscaling, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, direct air capture, technology deployment, public acceptance, niche markets, demand pull, policy risk, Paris Agreement, integrated assessment models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review