Cited by 368

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Challenges in the acceleration of sustainability transitions

Markard, Jochen, Geels, Frank W, Raven, Rob·2020·Environmental Research Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9468

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Dubois, 2019, It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 52, 144, 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.001 · DOI
  2. Geels, 2011, The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms, Environ. Innov. Societal Transit., 1, 24, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hess, 2014, Sustainability transitions: a political coalition perspective, Res. Policy, 43, 278, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.008 · DOI
  4. Isoaho, 2020, The politics of technology decline: discursive struggles over coal phase-out in the UK, Rev. Policy Res., 37, 342, 10.1111/ropr.12370 · DOI
  5. Kivimaa, 2016, Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions, Res. Policy, 45, 205, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008 · DOI
  6. Köhler, 2019, An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions, Environ. Innov. Societal Transit., 31, 1, 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Markard, 2018, The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy, Nat. Energy, 3, 628, 10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7 · DOI
  8. Markard, 2016, Analysis of complementarities: framework and examples from the energy transition, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 111, 63, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.008 · DOI
  9. Markard, 2012, Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Res. Policy, 41, 955, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · DOI
  10. McMeekin, 2019, Mapping the winds of whole system reconfiguration: analysing low-carbon transformations across production, distribution and consumption in the UK electricity system (1990–2016), Res. Policy, 48, 1216, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.007 · DOI
  11. Meckling, 2017, Policy sequencing toward decarbonization, Nat. Energy, 2, 918, 10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8 · DOI
  12. Papachristos, 2013, System interactions in socio-technical transitions: extending the multi-level perspective, Environ. Innov. Societal Transit., 7, 53, 10.1016/j.eist.2013.03.002 · DOI
  13. Raven, 2007, Co-evolution of waste and electricity regimes: multi-regime dynamics in the Netherlands (1969–2003), Energy Policy, 35, 2197, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Roberts, 2019, Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 140, 221, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.019 · DOI
  15. Rosenbloom, 2020, Engaging with multi-system interactions in sustainability transitions: a comment on the transitions research agenda, Environ. Innov. Societal Transit., 34, 336, 10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.003 · DOI
  16. Rosenbloom, 2020, Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change — and how ‘sustainability transition policy’ can help, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 117, 8664, 10.1073/pnas.2004093117 · DOI
  17. Sachs, 2019, Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals, Nat. Sustainability, 2, 805, 10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9 · DOI
  18. Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651 · DOI
  19. Shove, 2010, Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life, Res. Policy, 39, 471, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019 · DOI
  20. Thacker, 2019, Infrastructure for sustainable development, Nat. Sustainability, 2, 324, 10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Markard, J., Geels, F. W., & Raven, R.
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2020-08-01
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
081001
ISSN
1748-9326
Cited by
368
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review