Cited by 144Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Generalized probability theories: what determines the structure of quantum theory?

Open access
Janotta, Peter, Hinrichsen, Haye·2014·Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical

Abstract

The framework of generalized probabilistic theories is a powerful tool for studying the foundations of quantum physics. It provides the basis for a variety of recent findings that significantly improve our understanding of the rich physical structure of quantum theory. This review paper tries to present the framework and recent results to a broader readership in an accessible manner. To achieve this, we follow a constructive approach. Starting from few basic physically motivated assumptions we show how a given set of observations can be manifested in an operational theory. Furthermore, we characterize consistency conditions limiting the range of possible extensions. In this framework classical and quantum theory appear as special cases, and the aim is to understand what distinguishes quantum mechanics as the fundamental theory realized in nature. It turns out non-classical features of single systems can equivalently result from higher dimensional classical theories that have been restricted. Entanglement and non-locality, however, are shown to be genuine non-classical features.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1751-8113/47/32/323001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The optimality of a partially cloning process is typically assessed through the fidelity of the output states with the target state; for state independent cloning this is equivalent to assessing the average gate fidelities or finding the maximal value of p + q.

    “The optimality of a partially cloning process is typically assessed through the fidelity of the output states with the target state [65,66]; for state independent cloning this is equivalent to assessing the average gate fidelities, f (E ) and f ( Ē ), or finding the maximal value of p + q.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 144

Authors
Janotta, P., & Hinrichsen, H.
Affiliations
University of Würzburg (DE)
Venue
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
Published
2014-07-23
Volume
47
Issue
32
Pages
323001
ISSN
  • 1751-8113 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-8121
OpenAlex
W2152970550
Cited by
144
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
general probabilistic theories, quantum foundations, operational theory, consistency conditions, entanglement, nonlocality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review