Generalized probability theories: what determines the structure of quantum theory?
Open accessAbstract
The framework of generalized probabilistic theories is a powerful tool for studying the foundations of quantum physics. It provides the basis for a variety of recent findings that significantly improve our understanding of the rich physical structure of quantum theory. This review paper tries to present the framework and recent results to a broader readership in an accessible manner. To achieve this, we follow a constructive approach. Starting from few basic physically motivated assumptions we show how a given set of observations can be manifested in an operational theory. Furthermore, we characterize consistency conditions limiting the range of possible extensions. In this framework classical and quantum theory appear as special cases, and the aim is to understand what distinguishes quantum mechanics as the fundamental theory realized in nature. It turns out non-classical features of single systems can equivalently result from higher dimensional classical theories that have been restricted. Entanglement and non-locality, however, are shown to be genuine non-classical features.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The optimality of a partially cloning process is typically assessed through the fidelity of the output states with the target state; for state independent cloning this is equivalent to assessing the average gate fidelities or finding the maximal value of p + q.
“The optimality of a partially cloning process is typically assessed through the fidelity of the output states with the target state [65,66]; for state independent cloning this is equivalent to assessing the average gate fidelities, f (E ) and f ( Ē ), or finding the maximal value of p + q.”
From Simple formulation of no-cloning and no-hiding that admits efficient and robust verification (2024) · cites this paper as [65]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 144
- Authors
- Janotta, P., & Hinrichsen, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-07-23
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 323001
- ISSN
- 1751-8113 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8121
- OpenAlex
- W2152970550
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- general probabilistic theories, quantum foundations, operational theory, consistency conditions, entanglement, nonlocality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review