The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extra-oral halitosis: an overview
Open accessAbstract
Halitosis can be subdivided into intra-oral and extra-oral halitosis, depending on the place where it originates. Most reports now agree that the most frequent sources of halitosis exist within the oral cavity and include bacterial reservoirs such as the dorsum of the tongue, saliva and periodontal pockets, where anaerobic bacteria degrade sulfur-containing amino acids to produce the foul smelling volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), especially hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) and methyl mercaptan (CH(3)SH). Tongue coating is considered to be the most important source of VSCs. Oral malodor can now be treated effectively. Special attention in this overview is given to extra-oral halitosis. Extra-oral halitosis can be subdivided into non-blood-borne halitosis, such as halitosis from the upper respiratory tract including the nose and from the lower respiratory tract, and blood-borne halitosis. The majority of patients with extra-oral halitosis have blood-borne halitosis. Blood-borne halitosis is also frequently caused by odorous VSCs, in particular dimethyl sulfide (CH3SCH3). Extra-oral halitosis, covering about 5-10% of all cases of halitosis, might be a manifestation of a serious disease for which treatment is much more complicated than for intra-oral halitosis. It is therefore of utmost importance to differentiate between intra-oral and extra-oral halitosis. Differences between intra-oral and extra-oral halitosis are discussed extensively. The importance of applying odor characterization of various odorants in halitosis research is also highlighted in this article. The use of the odor index, odor threshold values and simulation of bad breath samples is explained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution of breath analysis based on humidity and gas sensors: Potential and challenges
Tai, H., Wang, S., Duan, Z., & Jiang, Y. (2020) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2020.128104 · Cited by 412
Choi, S.-J., Jang, B.-H., Lee, S.-J., Min, B. K., Rothschild, A., & Kim, I.-D. (2014) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am405088q · Cited by 393
Hybrid Volatolomics and Disease Detection
Broza, Y. Y., Mochalski, P., Ruzsanyi, V., Amann, A., & Haick, H. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201500153 · Cited by 290
Recent Advances in Emerging 2D Material‐Based Gas Sensors: Potential in Disease Diagnosis
Zhang, L., Khan, K., Zou, J., Zhang, H., & Li, Y. (2019) · Advanced Materials Interfaces · doi:10.1002/admi.201901329 · Cited by 281
Innovative Nanosensor for Disease Diagnosis
Kim, S.-J., Choi, S.-J., Jang, J.-S., Cho, H.-J., & Kim, I.-D. (2017) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00047 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Tangerman, A., & Winkel, E. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Breath Research
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 017003
- ISSN
- 1752-7155 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7163
- OpenAlex
- W2044298993
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extra-oral halitosis: an overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1752-7155/4/1/017003
- The paper
- Tangerman, A., & Winkel, E. G. (2010). Extra-oral halitosis: an overview. Journal of Breath Research. https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7155/4/1/017003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.