Cited by 2Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPlant and fungal interactionsAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimization of conventional plant surface sterilization procedure for isolation of phosphate solubilizing endophytic bacteria from wresah and peanut leaves

Open access
Prasgi, H C, Ariyanto, D P, Cahyani, V R·2025·IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

Abstract

Endophytes are microorganisms that colonize and live within plant tissues. The success of endophytes isolation was determined by surface sterilization to remove contaminants. Many studies have reported root surface sterilization for isolation endophytic bacteria but there is still limited information about leaf surface sterilization. This study aims to optimize the effectiveness of conventional plant surface sterilization procedure for isolation of P-solubilizing endophytic bacteria from wresah and peanut leaves. The assessment was conducted in four procedures: Procedure A, the leaf samples were rinsed with only running water; Procedure B, the leaf samples were sterilized sequentially with 70% ethanol, 2.5% NaOCl and sterile distilled water; Procedure C and Procedure D were similar to Procedure B, but using the higher concentration of NaOCl (3.25 and 5.25%). For all procedures, 0.1 ml aliquot from the final rinse water, serial dilution of whole leaves and mashed leaves were inoculated on Pikovskaya media. The results showed as the concentration of NaOCl increased, the surface bacterial contamination of leaf samples decreased. Samples sterilized by Procedure B showed the highest endophytic bacterial population density of 0.014x10 5 cfug−1 (wresah leaves) and 0.072x10 5 cfug−1 (peanut leaves). Procedure B was found effective in removing contaminants and maintaining the endophytic bacteria community.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1755-1315/1490/1/012025

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Kaur, 2023, J Agric Food Res, 11
  2. Anjum, 2015, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 8
  3. Yu, 2022, Front Plant Sci, 13
  4. 2017, J Plant Pathol Microbiol, 08
  5. Chouhan, 2015, IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, 9, 67
  6. Darkazanli, 2021, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2388

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Prasgi, H. C., Ariyanto, D. P., & Cahyani, V. R.
Affiliations
Sebelas Maret University (ID)
Venue
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Published
2025-04-01
Volume
1490
Issue
1
Pages
012025
ISSN
  • 1755-1315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-1307
OpenAlex
W4409947224
Cited by
2
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
4.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and fungal interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Keywords
endophytic bacteria, phosphate solubilization, groundnut, leaf endophytes, ethanol treatment, bacterial contamination removal, endophyte isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review