Cited by 64Battery Modeling and ManagementReliability and Maintenance OptimizationAdvancements in Battery Materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A review on prognostics approaches for remaining useful life of lithium-ion battery

Open access
Su, C, Chen, H J·2017·IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

Abstract

Lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery is a core component for various industrial systems, including satellite, spacecraft and electric vehicle, etc. The mechanism of performance degradation and remaining useful life (RUL) estimation correlate closely to the operating state and reliability of the aforementioned systems. Furthermore, RUL prediction of Li-ion battery is crucial for the operation scheduling, spare parts management and maintenance decision for such kinds of systems. In recent years, performance degradation prognostics and RUL estimation approaches have become a focus of the research concerning with Li-ion battery. This paper summarizes the approaches used in Li-ion battery RUL estimation. Three categories are classified accordingly, i.e. model-based approach, data-based approach and hybrid approach. The key issues and future trends for battery RUL estimation are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1755-1315/93/1/012040

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 64

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Liu D, 2014, Instrumentation, 1, 59
  2. Wu Z Y, 2012, J. Seu Sci. Technol., 27, 65

Metadata

Authors
Su, C., & Chen, H. J.
Affiliations
Southeast University (CN)
Corresponding author
Su, C
Venue
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Published
2017-11
Volume
93
Pages
012040
ISSN
  • 1755-1315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-1307
OpenAlex
W2767278549
Cited by
64
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71671035)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, remaining useful life prediction, battery prognostics, performance degradation, model-based prognostics, data-driven prognostics, electric vehicles, maintenance decision-making, spare parts management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review