The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development of a thermal control coating optimized for cryogenic space applications
Abstract
As NASA endeavors to extend the human presence in space beyond low Earth orbit, methods to efficiently store cryogenic propellants in space are required. Current state of the art rigid thermal control coatings absorb approximate 6% of the total solar irradiance, while state of the art thermal control paints absorb approximately 10% of the total solar irradiance. Consequently, radiative heat transfer a lone makes passive storage of cryogens in space impossible. A new rigid thermal control coating is in development and has achieved solar absorption values as low as -0.6 % (compared to a NIST standard) while maintaining high emissivity. This negative value for a rigid tile of pure yttria has required a new testing method be developed. Rigid tiles are very high performance but have more mass than paints and paper-th in coatings. Tiles must have a metallic substrate and create application challenges. While some use cases may necessarily address the challenges associated with rigid tiles in order to achieve required performance, a similar paint-like coating was also developed. The spray-on version of the new thermal control coating is easily applied to large complex surfaces and is very low mass. This version is also primarily yttria but includes a potassium bromide binder. Application to various substrates shows solar absorption values consistently below 5%, with a minimum of 2.8% achieved. Details of each version of this coating, along with test data is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Space probes frequently employ high-emissivity coatings to maintain instruments within optimal temperature ranges.
“Specifically, space probes frequently employ high-emissivity coatings to maintain instruments within optimal temperature ranges [14][15][16]”
From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Youngquist, 2016, Achieving cryogenic temperatures in deep space using a coating, Optics letters, 41, 1086, 10.1364/OL.41.001086 · DOI
- Youngquist, 2018, Cryogenic deep space thermal control coating, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 55, 622, 10.2514/1.A34019 · DOI · Paper page
- Swanger, Development of a Space Irradiance Simulator for Advanced Studies and Materials Research, 10.1088/1757-899X/1240/1/012006 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review
Li, B., & Shen, F. (2026) · Cryo · doi:10.3390/cryo2010004 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Krenn, A., Youngquist, R., Gibson, T., & Snyder, S.
- Venue
- IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2022-05-01
- Volume
- 1240
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 012001
- ISSN
- 1757-8981
- 1757-899X
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review